Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Claude Opus 5.5vsGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025
Updated Sep 2026

Claude Opus 5.5vsGemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 is cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 at $0.3/M vs $4/M input tokens.

Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 compared across 17 shared prompts
SpecClaude Opus 5.5Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025
Input price$4/M tokens$0.3/M tokens
Output price$20/M tokens$2.5/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Sep 2025
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 17 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Claude Opus 5.52,280 words
Architecture Review: Real-Time Collaborative Editor The most serious problems cluster in three areas: the sync model (client-clock LWW), cross-server propagation (per-server WebSockets with DB polling), and the CDN/auth layer, which can leak data between users. Issues are grouped by area below.
Read the full answer
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-20251,213 words
This architecture, while functional, has several critical flaws, particularly in its real-time synchronization, data consistency, and scaling strategy. Here is a detailed breakdown of the potential failure modes, race conditions, and bottlenecks, along with proposed solutions. I.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Claude Opus 5.53,435 words
The Transistor in 1920: A Counterfactual Through 1980 First, a Reality Check on the Premise A transistor "invented" in 1920 would not have changed the world in 1920. The actual 1947 transistor rested on three foundations that did not exist yet: Quantum theory of solids.
Read the full answer
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-20251,295 words
The Transistor in 1920: A Hypothetical History (1920-1980) The invention of the reliable, solid-state transistor (likely a point-contact or early junction type, robust enough for manufacturing) in 1920, replacing the bulky, power-hungry vacuum tube, would have fundamentally reshaped the 20th century. I.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Claude Opus 5.51,853 words
The Next 48 Hours: CEO Action Plan The Core Decision We disclose. The question is how to do it well, not whether. Before the schedule, here are the three facts that drive every decision below. 1. The harm is concrete.
Read the full answer
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-20251,378 words
This is a critical situation demanding immediate, decisive, and ethical action. Patient safety and regulatory integrity must precede financial preservation. Delaying disclosure is legally and ethically indefensible, particularly given the severity of the side effect (liver failure).
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Claude Opus 5.5300 words
Midnight Silk Noodles Creamy, tangy peanut noodles with a gentle kick, ready faster than takeout. Serves: 2 Prep time: 5 minutes Cook time: 10 minutes Total time: 15 minutes The 7 Ingredients 8 oz (225 g) spaghetti (or any long noodle) ¼ cup creamy peanut butter 3 tablespoons soy sauce 1 tablespoon honey (or sugar) 1…
Read the full answer
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025250 words
The Seven-Ingredient Sizzle: Garlic Butter Shrimp Scampi Skewers This savory dish combines the irresistible flavors of garlic, butter, and lemon with succulent shrimp, all easily achieved with just seven common pantry ingredients.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Claude Opus 5.51,442 words
How Large Language Models Work: Three Explanations For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM as a single, very large pure function: f(tokens[0..n]) → probability distribution over tokens[n+1]. Text is chunked into tokens (roughly word fragments, from a vocabulary of about 100k).
Read the full answer
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025806 words
Here are the explanations tailored to each audience: Explanation for the Experienced Software Engineer Focus: Analogy to familiar systems, scaling, and the emergent complexity from simple, scalable mechanisms. Addressing the "next word prediction" skepticism.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Claude Opus 5.5936 words
The 3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch "Decodes neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy. Works with any language, any device." (Slide 3) Why it's weak: It far exceeds the published state of the art. The best results for thought-to-text come from invasive implants.
Read the full answer
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025712 words
This is a strong pitch deck summary overall, tackling a massive problem with an ambitious solution. However, several claims stretch credulity or lack the necessary detail to convince a serious investor.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 costs 8.0x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 5.5
Input
$4.00
Output
$20.00
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025
Input
$0.30
13× cheaper
Output
$2.50
8.0× cheaper

Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 is cheaper on both: 13× input, 8.0× output.

Where to run it

4 hosts

Claude Opus 5.54 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Amazon Bedrock$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1M·99.8% upAzure AI Foundry$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1M·100% upAnthropic$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1M·100% upGoogle Vertex AI$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1M·100% up
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Claude Opus 5.5 is developed by Anthropic while Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 is developed by Google AI. Claude Opus 5.5 has a 1.0M token context window vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 17 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 17 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4/M input tokens and Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 costs $0.3/M input tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 is $3.70/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Claude Opus 5.5 logoSolar Mini 4 logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 5.5 logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 5.5 logoCommand A+ logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 5.5 logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 logoGPT-6 Luna logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 vs GPT-6 LunaLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Claude Opus 5.5 logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6Same lab
Claude Opus 5.5 logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1Same lab
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 vs Gemini 3.7 FlashSame lab
Claude Opus 5.5 logoQwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructSame size
Claude Opus 5.5 logoQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingSame size
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 logoQwen3.5 122B A10B logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10BNew provider
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 logoQwen3.5 27B logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 vs Qwen3.5 27BNew provider

Model pages

Claude Opus 5.5 logo
Claude Opus 5.519 outputs, specs and price
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-2025 logo
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview 09-202551 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed