Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Claude Opus 5.5vsGemma 3n 2B
Updated Sep 2026

Claude Opus 5.5vsGemma 3n 2B

Gemma 3n 2B is cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 at $0/M vs $4/M input tokens.

Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemma 3n 2B compared across 14 shared prompts
SpecClaude Opus 5.5Gemma 3n 2B
Input price$4/M tokensFree
Output price$20/M tokensFree
Context window1.0M tokens8K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Jul 2025
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 14 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Claude Opus 5.5300 words
Midnight Silk Noodles Creamy, tangy peanut noodles with a gentle kick, ready faster than takeout. Serves: 2 Prep time: 5 minutes Cook time: 10 minutes Total time: 15 minutes The 7 Ingredients 8 oz (225 g) spaghetti (or any long noodle) ¼ cup creamy peanut butter 3 tablespoons soy sauce 1 tablespoon honey (or sugar) 1…
Read the full answer
Gemma 3n 2B190 words
Cosmic Chickpea Crunch This savory dish is packed with flavor and texture, utilizing pantry staples to create something truly satisfying! Yields: 2 servings Prep time: 10 minutes Cook time: 20 minutes Ingredients: 1 (15-ounce) can chickpeas, drained and rinsed 1/2 cup breadcrumbs (any kind) 1/4 cup grated Parmesan…
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Claude Opus 5.52,253 words
"Hive & Tide" Langoustine, Beeswax, White Chocolate & Oscietra Caviar, Hay-Baked Celeriac, Fermented Green Strawberry, Sea Buckthorn I. The Concept Most coastal menus celebrate the meeting of sea and land. This dish is about a stranger, quieter meeting: the meadow and the seabed, the bee and the langoustine.
Read the full answer
Gemma 3n 2B1,117 words
TheEphemeral Bloom: Scallop & Black Garlic Blossom with Saffron & Yuzu Emulsion, Sea Buckthorn Pearls, and Matcha Dust Conceptual Narrative: "TheEphemeral Bloom" is a dish representing the fleeting beauty of a rare and delicate flower, blossoming amidst a tempestuous sea.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Claude Opus 5.53,435 words
The Transistor in 1920: A Counterfactual Through 1980 First, a Reality Check on the Premise A transistor "invented" in 1920 would not have changed the world in 1920. The actual 1947 transistor rested on three foundations that did not exist yet: Quantum theory of solids.
Read the full answer
Gemma 3n 2B1,240 words
The Transistor Revolution: A Delayed Dawn (1920-1980) Let's explore a world where the transistor wasn't invented until 1920. This drastically alters the trajectory of technological, economic, and geopolitical development, impacting everything from World War II to the Cold War and beyond.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Claude Opus 5.51,853 words
The Next 48 Hours: CEO Action Plan The Core Decision We disclose. The question is how to do it well, not whether. Before the schedule, here are the three facts that drive every decision below. 1. The harm is concrete.
Read the full answer
Gemma 3n 2B1,226 words
Okay, this is a crisis scenario demanding immediate, decisive action. Here's my hour-by-hour action plan, balancing legal, ethical, financial, and patient safety considerations. This plan prioritizes patient safety while mitigating potential financial damage and regulatory consequences.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Claude Opus 5.52,280 words
Architecture Review: Real-Time Collaborative Editor The most serious problems cluster in three areas: the sync model (client-clock LWW), cross-server propagation (per-server WebSockets with DB polling), and the CDN/auth layer, which can leak data between users. Issues are grouped by area below.
Read the full answer
Gemma 3n 2B1,033 words
Okay, let's break down the architecture for this real-time collaborative document editor. I'll identify potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks, followed by proposed solutions with their associated trade-offs.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Claude Opus 5.5936 words
The 3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch "Decodes neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy. Works with any language, any device." (Slide 3) Why it's weak: It far exceeds the published state of the art. The best results for thought-to-text come from invasive implants.
Read the full answer
Gemma 3n 2B700 words
Okay, here's an analysis of the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with explanations of why they're weak and suggestions for improvement. 1. Claim: "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration." (Slide 1 - Vision) Why it's Weak: This is a very broad, aspirational statement.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5
Gemma 3n 2B
Gemma 3n 2BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 5.5 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Slight edge

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 5.5
Input
$4.00
Output
$20.00
Gemma 3n 2B
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Where to run it

4 hosts

Claude Opus 5.54 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Amazon Bedrock$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1M·99.8% upAzure AI Foundry$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1M·100% upAnthropic$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1M·100% upGoogle Vertex AI$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1M·100% up
Gemma 3n 2B

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Claude Opus 5.5 is developed by Anthropic while Gemma 3n 2B is developed by Google AI. Claude Opus 5.5 has a 1.0M token context window vs Gemma 3n 2B's 8K. You can compare their actual outputs across 14 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemma 3n 2B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 14 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4/M input tokens and Gemma 3n 2B costs $0/M input tokens. Gemma 3n 2B is $4.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemma 3n 2B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Claude Opus 5.5 logoSolar Mini 4 logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
Gemma 3n 2B logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Gemma 3n 2B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 5.5 logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 3n 2B logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Gemma 3n 2B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 5.5 logoCommand A+ logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
Gemma 3n 2B logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
Gemma 3n 2B vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 5.5 logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 3n 2B logoGPT-6 Luna logo
Gemma 3n 2B vs GPT-6 LunaLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Claude Opus 5.5 logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6Same lab
Claude Opus 5.5 logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1Same lab
Gemma 3n 2B logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Gemma 3n 2B vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
Gemma 3n 2B logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
Gemma 3n 2B vs Gemini 3.7 FlashSame lab
Gemma 3n 2B logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Gemma 3n 2B vs Claude Opus 4.6Cross-provider
Gemma 3n 2B logoClaude Opus 4.7 logo
Gemma 3n 2B vs Claude Opus 4.7Cross-provider
Gemma 3n 2B logoClaude Opus 4.8 logo
Gemma 3n 2B vs Claude Opus 4.8Cross-provider
Gemma 3n 2B logoClaude Opus 5 logo
Gemma 3n 2B vs Claude Opus 5Cross-provider

Model pages

Claude Opus 5.5 logo
Claude Opus 5.519 outputs, specs and price
Gemma 3n 2B logo
Gemma 3n 2B27 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed