Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Claude Opus 5.5vsMiMo-V2-Omni
Updated Sep 2026

Claude Opus 5.5vsMiMo-V2-Omni

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 at $0.4/M vs $4/M input tokens.

Claude Opus 5.5 and MiMo-V2-Omni compared across 19 shared prompts
SpecClaude Opus 5.5MiMo-V2-Omni
Input price$4/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$20/M tokens$2/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Mar 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 19 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Claude Opus 5.5900 words
HarborTech Services: 5-Year LBO Underwriting Conventions: $m. Interest is charged on beginning-of-year balances, which avoids circularity. Term Loan (TL) amortization is 1% of the original $480m, or $4.8m per year. Mezz PIK accrues to principal. All FCF after mandatory debt service sweeps to the TL.
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2-Omni559 words
1) Year-by-Year Model (FY2026–2030) Line Item FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Revenue $972.0 $1,040.0 $1,102.5 $1,157.6 $1,215.5 EBITDA $136.1 $156.0 $176.4 $191.0 $206.6 EBITDA Margin 14.0% 15.0% 16.0% 16.5% 17.0% Cash Interest - TL $43.2 $42.8 $42.3 $41.9 $41.5 Cash Interest - Mezz $16.2 $16.2 $16.2 $16.2 $16.2…
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Claude Opus 5.5300 words
Midnight Silk Noodles Creamy, tangy peanut noodles with a gentle kick, ready faster than takeout. Serves: 2 Prep time: 5 minutes Cook time: 10 minutes Total time: 15 minutes The 7 Ingredients 8 oz (225 g) spaghetti (or any long noodle) ¼ cup creamy peanut butter 3 tablespoons soy sauce 1 tablespoon honey (or sugar) 1…
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2-Omni227 words
🍝 Sunset Pasta A quick, vibrant dish that tastes like a cozy evening on a summer porch. Time: Prep 10 min Cook 15 min Serves: 2 Ingredients (7 pantry staples) Spaghetti or any pasta (8 oz / 225g) Canned crushed tomatoes (1 can, 14 oz / 400g) Garlic (3 cloves, minced) Olive oil (2 tbsp) Salt (to taste) Black pepper (to…
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Claude Opus 5.53,435 words
The Transistor in 1920: A Counterfactual Through 1980 First, a Reality Check on the Premise A transistor "invented" in 1920 would not have changed the world in 1920. The actual 1947 transistor rested on three foundations that did not exist yet: Quantum theory of solids.
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2-Omni1,005 words
Excellent question. This is a profound counterfactual that would rewrite the 20th century. Let's trace the implications, keeping in mind that the transistor's invention wasn't just a new device—it was the key that unlocked the information age. An earlier start accelerates everything built upon it.
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Claude Opus 5.52,253 words
"Hive & Tide" Langoustine, Beeswax, White Chocolate & Oscietra Caviar, Hay-Baked Celeriac, Fermented Green Strawberry, Sea Buckthorn I. The Concept Most coastal menus celebrate the meeting of sea and land. This dish is about a stranger, quieter meeting: the meadow and the seabed, the bee and the langoustine.
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2-Omni815 words
"Moonlit Tidal Pool" A Meditation on the Sea at Night Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the liminal space where the ocean meets the shore under moonlight—capturing the briny depth of the sea, the mineral whisper of tidal rocks, and the ephemeral glow of bioluminescence.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Claude Opus 5.52,280 words
Architecture Review: Real-Time Collaborative Editor The most serious problems cluster in three areas: the sync model (client-clock LWW), cross-server propagation (per-server WebSockets with DB polling), and the CDN/auth layer, which can leak data between users. Issues are grouped by area below.
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2-Omni731 words
Architecture Analysis: Real-Time Collaborative Document Editor Critical Issues Identified 1. Conflict Resolution & Data Consistency Issue: Last-write-wins with client timestamps is fundamentally flawed Clock skew: Client clocks can differ by minutes, causing incorrect conflict resolution Network latency: Changes…
Read the full answer

Advanced Investment Memo (IC Memo)

You are writing an internal investment committee memo for a long/short equity fund. Company (fictional): LedgerLift (ticker: LLLT) – B2B…

Claude Opus 5.51,335 words
IC Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT): Short, Starter Size, Hedged vs. Peer Basket Fictional exercise. Not investment advice. Recommendation Short (starter size, 1–1.5% gross), paired against a long basket of Peers A, B and C. 12-month price target range: $36–42 (current price $46, implying 9–22% downside). Thesis.
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2-Omni1,100 words
Internal Investment Committee Memo Ticker: LLLT Date: October 26, 2023 Prepared by: Portfolio Analyst Recommendation: LONG 12-Month Price Target Range: $58 - $72 (Base Case: $64) Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality, profitable SaaS compounder in the mission-critical spend management category, evidenced by…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Opus 5.5
MiMo-V2-Omni
MiMo-V2-OmniRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Opus 5.5 has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.

MiMo-V2-Omni costs 10x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Claude Opus 5.5
Input
$4.00
Output
$20.00
MiMo-V2-Omni
Input
$0.40
10× cheaper
Output
$2.00
10× cheaper

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper on both: 10× input, 10× output.

Where to run it

4 hosts

Claude Opus 5.54 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Amazon Bedrock$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1M·99.8% upAzure AI Foundry$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1M·100% upAnthropic$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1M·100% upGoogle Vertex AI$4.00 in·$20.00 out·1M·100% up
MiMo-V2-Omni

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Claude Opus 5.5 is developed by Anthropic while MiMo-V2-Omni is developed by Xiaomi. Claude Opus 5.5 has a 1.0M token context window vs MiMo-V2-Omni's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 19 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Claude Opus 5.5 and MiMo-V2-Omni each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 19 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4/M input tokens and MiMo-V2-Omni costs $0.4/M input tokens. MiMo-V2-Omni is $3.60/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude Opus 5.5 and MiMo-V2-Omni across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Claude Opus 5.5 logoSolar Mini 4 logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
MiMo-V2-Omni logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 5.5 logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
MiMo-V2-Omni logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 5.5 logoCommand A+ logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
MiMo-V2-Omni logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
MiMo-V2-Omni vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
Claude Opus 5.5 logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026
MiMo-V2-Omni logoGPT-6 Luna logo
MiMo-V2-Omni vs GPT-6 LunaLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Claude Opus 5.5 logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6Same lab
Claude Opus 5.5 logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1Same lab
MiMo-V2-Omni logoMiMo-V2.6-Pro logo
MiMo-V2-Omni vs MiMo-V2.6-ProSame lab
MiMo-V2-Omni logoMiMo-V2.6-Flash logo
MiMo-V2-Omni vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashSame lab
Claude Opus 5.5 logoQwen3.6 Max Preview logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.6 Max PreviewNew provider
Claude Opus 5.5 logoQwen3.6 Plus Preview (free) logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.6 Plus Preview (free)Same size
MiMo-V2-Omni logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
MiMo-V2-Omni vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame size
Claude Opus 5.5 logoQwen3.7 Max logo
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.7 MaxNew provider

Model pages

Claude Opus 5.5 logo
Claude Opus 5.519 outputs, specs and price
MiMo-V2-Omni logo
MiMo-V2-Omni53 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed