Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs GPT-4o mini

Compare Claude Sonnet 4.6 by Anthropic against GPT-4o mini by OpenAI, context windows of 1.0M vs 128K, tested across 37 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 4.6 or GPT-4o mini?

Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-4o mini are both competitive models. Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for GPT-4o mini. Context windows: 1000K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Claude Sonnet 4.6 and GPT-4o mini

Claude Sonnet 4.6 is made by anthropic while GPT-4o mini is from openai. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has a 1000K token context window compared to GPT-4o mini's 128K. On pricing, Claude Sonnet 4.6 costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for GPT-4o mini.

Our Verdict
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.6
GPT-4o mini
GPT-4o miniRunner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Claude Sonnet 4.6 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

GPT-4o mini is 25x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Slight edge
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
94%

Claude Sonnet 4.6 uses 19.1x more emoji

Claude Sonnet 4.6
GPT-4o mini
56%Vocabulary54%
36wSentence Length18w
0.53Hedging0.84
5.1Bold3.8
3.4Lists3.3
0.19Emoji0.00
2.10Headings1.03
0.02Transitions0.23
Based on 23 + 22 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Claude Sonnet 4.6GPT-4o mini

Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.

178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.

Model Similarity Index

185x

price gap between models that write identically

178

models

12

clone pairs

32

dimensions

Devstral M / S
95.7%
Qwen3 Coder / Flash
95.6%
GPT-5.4 / Mini
93.3%

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions