Claude Sonnet 5vsQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Claude Sonnet 5 at $0.071/M vs $2/M input tokens.
| Spec | Claude Sonnet 5 | Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $2/M tokens | $0.071/M tokens |
| Output price | $10/M tokens | $0.285/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jun 2026 | Aug 2025 |
Our Verdict
Claude Sonnet 5
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude Sonnet 5 has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs 35x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Sonnet 5
Input
$2.00
Output
$10.00
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
28× cheaper
Output
$0.28
35× cheaper
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both: 28× input, 35× output.
Where to run it
5 hosts
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 25071 host
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
58%
Claude Sonnet 5 uses 2.7x more hedging
Claude Sonnet 5
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
59%Vocabulary52%
35wSentence Length15w
0.53Hedging0.20
3.5Bold7.0
3.5Lists4.2
0.79Emoji0.89
1.25Headings0.91
0.06Transitions0.10
Based on 27 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Sonnet 4Cross-provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M2.7New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Kimi K2 ThinkingNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Kimi K2.5New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Kimi K2.6New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeNew provider