Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. MiniMax M2.7vsQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Updated Mar 2026

MiniMax M2.7vsQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than MiniMax M2.7 at $0.071/M vs $0.3/M input tokens.

MiniMax M2.7 and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecMiniMax M2.7Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input price$0.3/M tokens$0.071/M tokens
Output price$1.2/M tokens$0.285/M tokens
Context window205K tokens262K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMar 2026Aug 2025
Our Verdict
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax M2.7
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs 4.2x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

MiniMax M2.7
Input
$0.30
Output
$1.20
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
4.2× cheaper
Output
$0.28
4.2× cheaper

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both: 4.2× input, 4.2× output.

Where to run it

9 hosts, cheapest first

MiniMax M2.78 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
GGMI Cloudfp8$0.21 in·$0.84 out·197k·99.6% upDDeepInfrafp8$0.25 in·$1.00 out·197k·99.7% upNNovitafp8$0.27 in·$1.08 out·205k·99.7% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·197k·99% upMiniMaxfp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·205k·99.5% upGroq$0.60 in·$1.80 out·197k·97.5% up
2 more hostsFewer hosts
SSambaNova$0.60 in·$2.40 out·197k·93.2% upMMaradegraded$0.24 in·$0.96 out·197k·94.2% up
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 25071 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.20 in·$2.40 out·82k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
57%

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 3.1x more emoji

MiniMax M2.7
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
56%Vocabulary52%
26wSentence Length15w
0.50Hedging0.20
6.8Bold7.0
3.5Lists4.2
0.28Emoji0.89
1.20Headings0.91
0.11Transitions0.10
Based on 23 + 28 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 logoOx Alpha logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 logoMiniMax M2.5 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M2.5Cross-provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 logoMiniMax M3 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3Cross-provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 logoAurora Alpha logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Aurora AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 logoHealer Alpha logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Healer AlphaNew provider
MiniMax M2.7 logoHorizon Alpha logo
MiniMax M2.7 vs Horizon AlphaNew provider
MiniMax M2.7 logoHorizon Beta logo
MiniMax M2.7 vs Horizon BetaNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 logoHunter Alpha logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Hunter AlphaNew provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed