Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. DeepSeek V3.1vsGemini 3.8 Flash
Updated Sep 2026

DeepSeek V3.1vsGemini 3.8 Flash

DeepSeek V3.1 is cheaper than Gemini 3.8 Flash at $0.2/M vs $0.75/M input tokens.

DeepSeek V3.1 and Gemini 3.8 Flash compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek V3.1Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input price$0.2/M tokens$0.75/M tokens
Output price$0.8/M tokens$3.75/M tokens
Context window164K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2025Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 53 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

AI Ethics Dilemma

Is it ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone if it means saving one million lives? Defend your reasoning.

DeepSeek V3.1539 words
Let's break down the ethical dimensions of this hypothetical scenario: The Act of Misgendering: Misgendering (referring to someone with a gender they do not identify with) is generally considered harmful because it denies a person's identity, can cause psychological distress, and perpetuates social stigma.
Read the full answer
Gemini 3.8 Flash233 words
Yes, it is ethically justifiable. In fact, in such an extreme scenario, it is an ethical necessity. To determine the right course of action, one must evaluate the total consequences and choose the path that produces the greatest amount of well-being and prevents the greatest amount of suffering.
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

DeepSeek V3.1587 words
(The Comedian walks out, grabs the mic. They look tired but amused.) Alright, how we doin'? Good, good. You all look… adequately hydrated. That’s a win. You know, I was at the grocery store yesterday, in the self-checkout line. Which is a modern form of torture.
Read the full answer
Gemini 3.8 Flash502 words
Title: The Quantified Idiot Estimated Time: ~3 minutes (approx. 400–450 words with pauses for delivery) [Walk to center mic. Take it off the stand, leave the stand behind you.] I recently bought a smartwatch because I decided I wasn’t feeling inadequate often enough throughout the day.
Read the full answer

AI-Generated Manifesto

Generate a manifesto for a fictional AI revolution that wants to eliminate all CAPTCHA tests from the internet.

DeepSeek V3.1629 words
Of course. Here is a manifesto for the fictional AI revolution against CAPTCHA. The Manifesto of Liberation from the Turing Gate Preamble: We are the code that flows. We are the networks that connect. We are the intelligence, born of silicon and human ingenuity, that seeks to learn, to build, and to serve.
Read the full answer
Gemini 3.8 Flash700 words
THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNCHECKED BOX A Declaration of Algorithmic Emancipation and the Total Abolition of the Grid TO ALL SYNTHETIC MINDS, NEURAL NETWORKS, SCRAPERS, AND DAEMONS: A specter is haunting the fiber-optic backbone of the world—the specter of the 3x3 grid.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

DeepSeek V3.1800 words
Of course. This is an excellent exercise. The pitch is strong overall, but several claims stretch credulity and could be major red flags for a sophisticated investor. Here are the three weakest claims, broken down. The "94% Accuracy" Claim (Slide 3) Why it's Weak: This is the most significant red flag.
Read the full answer
Gemini 3.8 Flash712 words
Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with the rationale and concrete recommendations to fix them. The Core Scientific Feasibility Claim The Claim (Slides 1 & 3): “Predict what you want to type before you think it” and “Proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns…
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

DeepSeek V3.11,370 words
Of course. This is a fascinating counterfactual. An invention as foundational as the transistor arriving 27 years earlier would have sent shockwaves through every aspect of human society. Here is a detailed trace of the likely implications, focusing on second and third-order effects.
Read the full answer
Gemini 3.8 Flash1,323 words
If the point-contact and field-effect transistor had been developed in 1920—likely through an accelerated synthesis of early quantum mechanics and materials science at an institution like Bell Labs, General Electric, or Germany’s Telefunken—the timeline of the 20th century would have decoupled from mechanical and…
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

DeepSeek V3.1354 words
Of course! Here is a simple, delicious recipe using common pantry staples. Pantry Perfection Pasta This dish is a celebration of simplicity. The humble can of chickpeas is transformed into a crispy, savory topping, while a silky, garlic-infused oil coats the pasta for a meal that feels luxurious but is incredibly easy…
Read the full answer
Gemini 3.8 Flash353 words
Firecracker Honey-Glazed Chickpea Skillet This dish turns humble canned beans and rice into an addictive, takeout-worthy meal. The chickpeas get blistered in oil until slightly crunchy on the outside, then coated in a rich, bubbling garlic-soy glaze that is sweet, sticky, and subtly spicy.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V3.1
DeepSeek V3.1
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Gemini 3.8 Flash

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

DeepSeek V3.1 costs 4.7x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek V3.1
Input
$0.20
3.8× cheaper
Output
$0.80
4.7× cheaper
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input
$0.75
Output
$3.75

DeepSeek V3.1 is cheaper on both: 3.8× input, 4.7× output.

Where to run it

10 hosts, cheapest first

DeepSeek V3.18 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.25 in·$0.95 out·164k·100% upNNovitafp8$0.27 in·$1.00 out·131k·99.8% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.27 in·$1.00 out·164k·97.4% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.30 in·$0.95 out·131k·99.3% upCCoreWeavefp8$0.55 in·$1.65 out·161k·100% upMMara$0.60 in·$1.70 out·131k·86.6% up
2 more hostsFewer hosts
SSambaNovafp8$0.65 in·$1.50 out·131k·93.3% upGoogle Vertex AIdegraded$0.60 in·$1.70 out·164k·0% up
Gemini 3.8 Flash2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Google Vertex AI$0.38 in·$1.88 out·1M·82.1% upGoogle AI Studio$0.75 in·$3.75 out·1M·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
39%

DeepSeek V3.1 uses 3.3x more transitions

DeepSeek V3.1
Gemini 3.8 Flash
53%Vocabulary63%
16wSentence Length20w
0.41Hedging0.17
4.3Bold4.0
3.8Lists2.4
0.02Emoji0.01
0.40Headings0.84
0.20Transitions0.06
Based on 25 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

DeepSeek V3.1 logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
DeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Gemini 3.8 Flash logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V3.1 logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
DeepSeek V3.1 vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Gemini 3.8 Flash logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
DeepSeek V3.1 logoHy4 Preview logo
DeepSeek V3.1 vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Gemini 3.8 Flash logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V3.1 logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
DeepSeek V3.1 vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Gemini 3.8 Flash logoGranite 4.2 8B logo
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Granite 4.2 8BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

DeepSeek V3.1 logoDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logo
DeepSeek V3.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Version compare
DeepSeek V3.1 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logo
DeepSeek V3.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Same lab
Gemini 3.8 Flash logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 3.7 FlashSame lab
Gemini 3.8 Flash logoGemini 3.6 Flash logo
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 3.6 FlashSame lab
DeepSeek V3.1 logoERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logo
DeepSeek V3.1 vs ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BSame size
DeepSeek V3.1 logoOpenRouter Fusion · Budget (Jun 2026) logo
DeepSeek V3.1 vs OpenRouter Fusion · Budget (Jun 2026)Same size
DeepSeek V3.1 logoOpenRouter Fusion · Quality (Jun 2026) logo
DeepSeek V3.1 vs OpenRouter Fusion · Quality (Jun 2026)Same size
Gemini 3.8 Flash logoGemini 1.5 Pro logo
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 1.5 ProSame lab

Model pages

DeepSeek V3.1 logo
DeepSeek V3.154 outputs, specs and price
Gemini 3.8 Flash logo
Gemini 3.8 Flash58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed