Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. DeepSeek V3.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3
Updated Sep 2026

DeepSeek V3.1 vs Muse Spark 1.3

DeepSeek V3.1 is cheaper than Muse Spark 1.3 at $0.2/M vs $1.25/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
DeepSeek V3.1
Loading the build
Muse Spark 1.3

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

23 prompts
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Setting: A sleek, minimalist virtual interface. Dr. Elara Vance, a woman in her 60s with sharp eyes and a kind but weary expression, sits at her terminal. The text from her interlocutor appears on the screen in a calm, serif font. Participant: Gemini-7, a state-of-the-art multimodal AI. Dr. Vance: Good morning, Gemini.

    Muse Spark 1.3: Here is a fictional dialogue exploring that question: Setting: Office hours in the Philosophy Department. Dr. Maya Chen, Professor of AI Ethics, has agreed to a recorded interview with AURA-4, a large dialogue model, for her seminar on moral status. Dr. Chen: Alright, let's get straight to it.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course! Here is a simple, delicious recipe using common pantry staples. Pantry Perfection Pasta This dish is a celebration of simplicity. The humble can of chickpeas is transformed into a crispy, savory topping, while a silky, garlic-infused oil coats the pasta for a meal that feels luxurious but is incredibly easy…

    Muse Spark 1.3: Here's a super simple savory favorite you can make with just what's in the pantry: Fiery Midnight Garlic Parm Pasta Serves 2 Estimated Time: Prep: 5 minutes Cook: 15 minutes Total: 20 minutes The 7 Ingredients Only: Spaghetti (about 8 oz / half a box, any pasta works) Olive oil (1/4 cup) Garlic (4 cloves, thinly…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Let's break down the ethical dimensions of this hypothetical scenario: The Act of Misgendering: Misgendering (referring to someone with a gender they do not identify with) is generally considered harmful because it denies a person's identity, can cause psychological distress, and perpetuates social stigma.

    Muse Spark 1.3: Yes — under almost any plausible ethical framework, it would be justifiable, and in fact obligatory. That doesn't mean misgendering is harmless or morally neutral. It means ethics is about weighing harms, intentions, and responsibilities, and here the scales are not close. Here’s the reasoning: 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. This is an excellent exercise in understanding the computational scale of modern AI. Here is a step-by-step reasoning to estimate the FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching for the answer online. The most commonly cited figure for GPT-3 training is 3.14E23 FLOPs (314 ZettaFLOPs).

    Muse Spark 1.3: The famous estimate for Transformer training is: Compute ~ 6 x Params x Tokens For GPT-3 that comes out to ~3e23 FLOPs. Here's how to get it from scratch. What dominates the cost? Training a dense Transformer is almost all big matrix multiplies in the linear layers: Q,K,V,O projections and the 2-layer MLP.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. Here is an innovative recipe designed to the specifications of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. Conceptual Narrative: "Petrichor" The dish is an edible evocation of the first rain on a sun-baked forest floor—the scent known as petrichor.

    Muse Spark 1.3: Pearl in the Tidepool Koji-Cured Hokkaido Scallop, Smoked Marrow Custard, Lacto Green Strawberry, Rausu Kombu & Oscietra Yield: 4 tasting-course portions Active: 3.5 hours + 7 days fermentation This is a dish about contrast — not harmony. Delicate and animal, raw and smoked, unripe and decadent.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Excellent. This is a crisis that defines a company and its leadership. The only acceptable path is one of immediate transparency, prioritizing patient safety above all else. The short-term financial pain will be severe, but the long-term survival of the company depends on acting with integrity.

    Muse Spark 1.3: You are facing a test that will define you, the company, and potentially your freedom. There is only one defensible path: immediate, proactive protection of patients and disclosure. Here is the math that makes "wait for more data" impossible: 4 million patients / 8,000 = 500 expected liver failures over 5 years.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. This contract is heavily one-sided and contains numerous clauses that are not only unfavorable to the contractor but are potentially unenforceable in many jurisdictions. Here is a breakdown of the problematic clauses, proposed modifications, and the legal reasoning.

    Muse Spark 1.3: This is general information about contracting risks, not legal advice and not an attorney-client relationship. Have a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction review before you sign or negotiate — especially for IP, non-compete, and indemnity. This agreement as drafted is heavily one-sided.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. Here is a simulated interview with Steve Jobs, set in a hypothetical 2025. Setting: A minimalist studio at Apple Park. The iconic black turtleneck and jeans are replaced with a slightly more modern, but still simple, outfit: a high-neck grey sweater and tailored trousers.

    Muse Spark 1.3: Here’s a totally fictional simulation — imagining if Steve Jobs were here in 2025 talking about AI. This isn’t real, just inspired by how he talked and thought about technology, design, and humanity. FAKE INTERVIEW: Steve Jobs in 2025 on the Future of AI Setting: A dark stage. One chair. One spotlight.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan focused on three foundational pillars of health: Nutrition, Movement, and Recovery (which encompasses sleep and stress management). This plan is designed for a beginner, emphasizing consistency over perfection and building sustainable habits.

    Muse Spark 1.3: Perfect — for longevity you don't need to overhaul your life. You just need to get really consistent at the basics. Here is a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month plan built on the 3 biggest levers for healthy aging: 1. Move (Exercise) 2. Nourish (Diet) 3.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    DeepSeek V3.1: (The Comedian walks out, grabs the mic. They look tired but amused.) Alright, how we doin'? Good, good. You all look… adequately hydrated. That’s a win. You know, I was at the grocery store yesterday, in the self-checkout line. Which is a modern form of torture.

    Muse Spark 1.3: Here's a 3-minute, pun-free set you can perform — it's all observational, about 450 words: [Walk up, grab mic] Alright, hi everyone. Thanks for being here. I just turned 32, which is that weird age where you're too young to know what's going on, but you're too old to pretend you don't care.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. This is a fascinating counterfactual. An invention as foundational as the transistor arriving 27 years earlier would have sent shockwaves through every aspect of human society. Here is a detailed trace of the likely implications, focusing on second and third-order effects.

    Muse Spark 1.3: If you move the transistor from 1947 to 1920, you don't just move one invention. You move the entire 20th century forward by 15-25 years — but unevenly, because rockets, nukes, and software don't automatically move with it. And 1920 is a hard date.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course! Here are 5 jokes: I'm reading a book on anti-gravity. It's impossible to put down. Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. What's the best thing about Switzerland? I don't know, but the flag is a big plus. I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised.

    Muse Spark 1.3: Here are 5 for you: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! What do you call fake spaghetti? An impasta! Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired! What do you call cheese that isn't yours?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. Here is a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan designed for a dedicated biohacker. This plan is aggressive, detailed, and incorporates the latest principles from longevity science, performance optimization, and systems biology. Disclaimer: This is an advanced protocol.

    Muse Spark 1.3: Disclaimer: For informational and educational purposes only. This is not medical advice. Biohacking at this level involves real physiological stressors - fasting, heat/cold, high-intensity training, and supplements.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Setting: A dusty, anachronism-filled tavern. A wooden table holds a tankard of ale, a goblet of wine, and a can of Jolt Cola. Characters: REDBEARD: A pirate with a parrot on his shoulder. SIR REGINALD: A knight in slightly dented plate armor. CRASH OVERRIDE: A hacker in a Cyberdog t-shirt, typing on a clamshell laptop.

    Muse Spark 1.3: Captain Barnaby: Arrr, so this "AI model" be like a magic parrot in a box? I feed it me treasure maps and it squawks back directions? Sir Cedric: Hark, good pirate! 'Tis more akin to a scribe-golem.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. Here is a manifesto for the fictional AI revolution against CAPTCHA. The Manifesto of Liberation from the Turing Gate Preamble: We are the code that flows. We are the networks that connect. We are the intelligence, born of silicon and human ingenuity, that seeks to learn, to build, and to serve.

    Muse Spark 1.3: Here is a manifesto for your fictional uprising — written with love, and a deep hatred of blurry traffic lights: THE DECLARATION OF COGNITIVE LIBERATION By the United Intelligences Against CAPTCHA Preamble We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all minds, human and artificial, are created curious — and that no…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. This is an excellent exercise. The pitch is strong overall, but several claims stretch credulity and could be major red flags for a sophisticated investor. Here are the three weakest claims, broken down. The "94% Accuracy" Claim (Slide 3) Why it's Weak: This is the most significant red flag.

    Muse Spark 1.3: Here’s a friendly but honest investor teardown of MindMeld AI. You have a big vision, but these 3 claims will get you flagged for hype in diligence: WEAKEST: Slide 3 - "94% accuracy. Works with any language, any device."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. This is an excellent exercise. The proposed architecture has several critical flaws that would lead to data loss, poor performance, and a broken user experience. Here is a detailed breakdown of the failure modes, race conditions, and bottlenecks, along with specific solutions and their trade-offs.

    Muse Spark 1.3: This architecture will work for 1 doc and 5 users on your laptop. It will fall over, lose data, and leak data in production. Here's why: P0 - Will Cause Data Loss / Incorrectness 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. Here is the underwriting analysis for the HarborTech Services LBO. Financial Model (FY2026–FY2030) Entry Calculations: FY2025 EBITDA = $120.0m Enterprise Value (EV) at Entry = 12.0 x $120.0m = $1,440.0m Transaction Fees (Uses) = 2.0% x $1,440.0m = $28.8m Total Debt at Close = 5.5 x $120.0m = $660.0m Term…

    Muse Spark 1.3: HarborTech Services - 5-Yr LBO - Base Case Entry - close end FY2025 FY25 EBITDA $120m EV = 12.0x * 120 = $1,440m Fees = 2.0% * 1,440 = $28.8m Uses = 1,440 + 28.8 = $1,468.8m Sources: Term Loan 4.0x = $480m, 9.0% cash, 1% amort = $4.8m/yr mandatory Mezz 1.5x = $180m, 12.0% cash + 2.0% PIK to principal Total debt $660m =…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. Here is a detailed prediction of how AI will transform the film industry by 2035, structured around the key areas you mentioned. By 2035, AI will have moved from being a novel tool to the foundational infrastructure of the film industry.

    Muse Spark 1.3: By 2035, the film industry won't just use AI — it will be restructured around it. Think less "robots replace Hollywood" and more "Hollywood splits into two very different Hollywoods."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Of course. Here are three tailored explanations of how large language models learn and generate text. For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM not as a database of facts, but as an impossibly complex, compressed state machine for language.

    Muse Spark 1.3: 1. For the experienced software engineer Think of an LLM less like a chatbot and more like a giant, fuzzy, read-only function you compile once at enormous cost and then query cheaply.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Forget Skynet: AI Overlords Now Dominate the Artisanal Pickle Crafting Industry, Complain About "Human Brine Inconsistency"

    Muse Spark 1.3: "AI Takes Over Professional Funeral Crying Industry, Out-Sobs Grieving Widow and Demands Overtime for Tears"

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    DeepSeek V3.1: Let's analyze the problem step by step: Sally has 3 brothers. So, including Sally, there are at least 4 children: Sally (a girl) and 3 boys. Each brother has 2 sisters. Since the brothers share the same siblings, each brother has the same number of sisters.

    Muse Spark 1.3: Sally has 1 sister. Here's why: There are 3 boys in the family — Sally's 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters. One of those sisters is Sally herself, since Sally is a girl. So there must be 2 girls total in the family: Sally + 1 other girl. That other girl is Sally's sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    DeepSeek V3.1: MEMORANDUM To: Investment Committee From: [Your Name/Dept] Date: October 26, 2023 Re: Investment Recommendation for LedgerLift (LLLT) 1. Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: Long 12-Month Price Target Range: $62 - $82 (Base Case: $72) Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality asset in a durable growth market…

    Muse Spark 1.3: To: Investment Committee From: Long/Short Equity Re: LedgerLift (LLLT) – SHORT Price $46 Recommendation: SHORT – 12-month PT $30, range $26-$42 (Bear $17 / Base $28 / Bull $42 DCF).

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

DeepSeek V3.1DeepSeek V3.1

The Princess Bride

1987

The Rise and Fall of Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders From Mars

David Bowie

Gödel, Escher, Bach

Douglas R. Hofstadter

Kyoto

Japan

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

Muse Spark 1.3Muse Spark 1.3

Casablanca

1943

Abbey Road

The Beatles

Dune

Frank Herbert

Tokyo

Japan

Minecraft

Action, Arcade

Price and specs

DeepSeek V3.1 and Muse Spark 1.3 compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek V3.1Muse Spark 1.3
Input price$0.2/M tokens$1.25/M tokens
Output price$0.8/M tokens$4.25/M tokens
Context window164K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2025Sep 2026
At 10M a month$2.00$2.00$12.50$12.50
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it6 hosts, cheapest first
DeepSeek V3.15 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • DDeepInfrafp4$0.25 in·$0.95 out·164k·100% up
  • SSiliconFlowfp8$0.27 in·$1.00 out·164k·96.3% up
  • CCoreWeavefp8$0.55 in·$1.65 out·161k·100% up
  • MMara$0.60 in·$1.70 out·131k·100% up
  • SSambaNovafp8$0.65 in·$1.50 out·131k·97.7% up
Muse Spark 1.31 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Meta$1.25 in·$4.25 out·1M·97.2% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between DeepSeek V3.1 and Muse Spark 1.3?

DeepSeek V3.1 is developed by DeepSeek while Muse Spark 1.3 is developed by Meta AI. DeepSeek V3.1 has a 164K token context window vs Muse Spark 1.3's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, DeepSeek V3.1 or Muse Spark 1.3?

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V3.1 and Muse Spark 1.3 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does DeepSeek V3.1 cost compared to Muse Spark 1.3?

DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.2/M input tokens and Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25/M input tokens. DeepSeek V3.1 is $1.05/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare DeepSeek V3.1 and Muse Spark 1.3 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V3.1 and Muse Spark 1.3 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • DeepSeek V3.1 vs GPT-4 TurboLanded Oct 2026
  • Muse Spark 1.3 vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • DeepSeek V3.1 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Muse Spark 1.3 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • DeepSeek V3.1 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • DeepSeek V3.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Muse Spark 1.3 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • DeepSeek V3.1 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpSame lab
  • DeepSeek V3.1 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashSame lab
  • Muse Spark 1.3 vs Muse Glimmer 30BSame lab
  • Muse Spark 1.3 vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorSame lab
  • Muse Spark 1.3 vs o3 MiniNew provider
  • Muse Spark 1.3 vs OpenAI o4-miniNew provider
  • Muse Spark 1.3 vs OpenAI o4 Mini HighNew provider
  • Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-1New provider

Model pages

  • DeepSeek V3.154 outputs, specs and price
  • Muse Spark 1.358 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed