What is the difference between DeepSeek R1 0528 and GLM 4.7 Flash?

DeepSeek R1 0528 is developed by DeepSeek while GLM 4.7 Flash is developed by Zhipu AI. DeepSeek R1 0528 has a 164K token context window vs GLM 4.7 Flash's 200K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or GLM 4.7 Flash?

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek R1 0528 and GLM 4.7 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does DeepSeek R1 0528 cost compared to GLM 4.7 Flash?

DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens and GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.07/M input tokens. DeepSeek R1 0528 is $0.07/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare DeepSeek R1 0528 and GLM 4.7 Flash on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek R1 0528 and GLM 4.7 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Jan 2026

DeepSeek R1 0528vsGLM 4.7 Flash

DeepSeek R1 0528 is cheaper than GLM 4.7 Flash at $0/M vs $0.07/M input tokens.

DeepSeek R1 0528 and GLM 4.7 Flash compared across 54 shared prompts
Spec	DeepSeek R1 0528	GLM 4.7 Flash
Input price	Free	$0.07/M tokens
Output price	Free	$0.4/M tokens
Context window	164K tokens	200K tokens
Weights	Open	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	No	No
Released	May 2025	Jan 2026
SWE-bench Verified	57.6%	59.2%