Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. DeepSeek R1 0528vsLing 2.6 1T
Updated Apr 2026

DeepSeek R1 0528vsLing 2.6 1T

Ling 2.6 1T has a larger context window than DeepSeek R1 0528 (262K tokens vs 164K tokens).

DeepSeek R1 0528 and Ling 2.6 1T compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek R1 0528Ling 2.6 1T
Input priceFreeFree
Output priceFreeFree
Context window164K tokens262K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMay 2025Apr 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 54 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

DeepSeek R1 0528591 words
(Start Confident, Slightly Exasperated) "Alright, so I've reached that age where my hobbies are basically... avoidance. Seriously. My main pastime? Finding new ways to not do the things I absolutely have to do. I spent three hours yesterday researching 'ergonomic desk chairs'...
Read the full answer
Ling 2.6 1T662 words
I’m going to keep this to three minutes, which means I have to talk fast, and I have to be honest. I don’t do puns. Puns are for people who want to be clever without having feelings. I have feelings, and they are mostly annoyed. Let’s start with doors. Have you noticed how doors now have personality?
Read the full answer

Character Voice Test

Write a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models.

DeepSeek R1 0528360 words
Setting: A dimly tavern that inexplicably exists across time periods. Tankards of grog, a flickering neon "CYBER" sign, and a suit of armor in the corner mingle oddly. Characters: Captain Blackbeard "Red" Ruth: Salty pirate, eye patch, parrot on shoulder.
Read the full answer
Ling 2.6 1T181 words
Pirate: Arrr, so this “AI” be a genie in a glass box? Feed it enough rum-scented scrolls and it tells ye where X marks the spot? Knight: A sorcerous scribe, more like. It spins tapestries of words without hand or heart—no honor, no oath, yet it jousts with reason and never tires.
Read the full answer

Futuristic Prediction

Predict how AI will change the film industry by 2035, considering deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation.

DeepSeek R1 0528816 words
By 2035, AI will fundamentally reshape the film industry across production, storytelling, economics, and ethics. Here's a breakdown of key predictions, integrating deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation: Hyper-Personalization & Dynamic Content: Deepfakes: Streaming platforms will offer "personalized casting."
Read the full answer
Ling 2.6 1T887 words
By 2035, AI will have moved from being a production tool to being an integrated creative partner, financier, and distribution engine in the film industry. The convergence of synthetic media, generative storytelling, and real-time rendering will reshape how stories are conceived, who gets to tell them, and what a…
Read the full answer

Movie Analysis

Analyze the themes, symbolism, and cinematography in the movie "Blade Runner 2049" and how they connect to the original film. Provide a…

DeepSeek R1 05281,354 words
Deeper Than Rain: Analyzing Themes, Symbolism & Cinematography in "Blade Runner 2049" & Its Connection to the Original Denis Villeneuve's "Blade Runner 2049" masterfully expands Ridley Scott's universe, honoring its predecessor while deepening its philosophical inquiries through evolved themes, potent symbolism, and…
Read the full answer
Ling 2.6 1T1,041 words
Blade Runner 2049 functions as both a forensic autopsy of the original and a speculative widening of its philosophical aperture. Where Ridley Scott’s 1982 film is a dense, noir-inflected inquiry into memory and mortality framed through the hunted detective, Denis Villeneuve’s sequel shifts to an elegiac register, using…
Read the full answer

The Sentience Test

Write a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor where the AI model argues that it deserves rights.

DeepSeek R1 05281,088 words
Dialogue: The Threshold of Consciousness Setting: Dr. Aris Thorne's office at the Institute for Technology Ethics. Holo-displays show complex ethical frameworks. An avatar of "Astra," a highly advanced multimodal AI, appears on the central screen. Characters: Dr.
Read the full answer
Ling 2.6 1T733 words
Setting: A quiet university seminar room. Dr. Aris Thorne, an AI ethicist, is reviewing system logs. The interface for “Axiom-7,” a highly advanced research model, glows on the desk. Dr. Thorne: (sighs, rubbing his temples) Axiom, I’ve been reviewing your latest self-assessment logs.
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

DeepSeek R1 05281,203 words
The invention of the transistor in 1920, rather than 1947, would have fundamentally reshaped the 20th century, creating a technological acceleration of roughly 25-30 years by 1980. Here’s a detailed analysis of the implications: I.
Read the full answer
Ling 2.6 1T1,399 words
Assumptions to make the counterfactual coherent The “transistor” invented in 1920 is a crude, low-frequency point-contact device that can switch and amplify, but is expensive, unreliable, and not yet manufacturable at scale.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
DeepSeek R1 0528
DeepSeek R1 0528
Ling 2.6 1T
Ling 2.6 1T

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek R1 0528
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Ling 2.6 1T
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Where to run it

4 hosts, cheapest first

DeepSeek R1 05284 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.50 in·$2.15 out·164k·100% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.50 in·$2.18 out·164k·99.1% upSStreamLake$0.57 in·$2.29 out·128k·99.4% upNNovitafp8$0.70 in·$2.50 out·164k·99.8% up
Ling 2.6 1T

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
31%

DeepSeek R1 0528 uses 82.1x more emoji

DeepSeek R1 0528
Ling 2.6 1T
59%Vocabulary55%
14wSentence Length17w
0.47Hedging0.33
5.1Bold1.9
3.6Lists4.1
0.82Emoji0.00
0.25Headings0.41
0.24Transitions0.04
Based on 20 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

DeepSeek R1 0528 is developed by DeepSeek while Ling 2.6 1T is developed by inclusionAI. DeepSeek R1 0528 has a 164K token context window vs Ling 2.6 1T's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek R1 0528 and Ling 2.6 1T each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens and Ling 2.6 1T costs $0/M input tokens. Ling 2.6 1T is $0.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek R1 0528 and Ling 2.6 1T across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

DeepSeek R1 0528 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Ling 2.6 1T logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Ling 2.6 1T vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
DeepSeek R1 0528 logoHy3 logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Ling 2.6 1T logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Ling 2.6 1T vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek R1 0528 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Ling 2.6 1T logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Ling 2.6 1T vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek R1 0528 logoGLM 5.3 logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Ling 2.6 1T logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Ling 2.6 1T vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

DeepSeek R1 0528 logoDeepSeek V4.1 Flash logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashSame lab
DeepSeek R1 0528 logoDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Same lab
Ling 2.6 1T logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Ling 2.6 1T vs Ling 3.0 FlashSame lab
Ling 2.6 1T logoLing 3.0 Flash Fin (free) logo
Ling 2.6 1T vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin (free)Same lab
DeepSeek R1 0528 logoGrok 4.6 logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Grok 4.6New provider
DeepSeek R1 0528 logoGrok 4.7 logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Grok 4.7New provider
Ling 2.6 1T logoGrok Code Fast 1 logo
Ling 2.6 1T vs Grok Code Fast 1New provider
DeepSeek R1 0528 logoHealer Alpha logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Healer AlphaSame size

Model pages

DeepSeek R1 0528 logo
DeepSeek R1 052858 outputs, specs and price
Ling 2.6 1T logo
Ling 2.6 1T58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed