DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Llama 3.1 405B
Compare DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek against Llama 3.1 405B by Meta AI, context windows of 164K vs 128K, tested across 12 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
DeepSeek R1 0528
Llama 3.1 405B
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
DeepSeek R1 0528
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Llama 3.1 405B
Input
$2.70
Output
$3.10
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
50%
DeepSeek R1 0528 uses 683.2x more bold
DeepSeek R1 0528
Llama 3.1 405B
64%Vocabulary56%
10wSentence Length15w
0.30Hedging0.41
6.8Bold0.0
4.9Lists1.9
0.00Emoji0.03
0.40Headings0.00
0.00Transitions0.16
Based on 4 + 5 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
