Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. DeepSeek R1 0528vsMiniMax M3
Updated Jun 2026

DeepSeek R1 0528vsMiniMax M3

DeepSeek R1 0528 is cheaper than MiniMax M3 at $0/M vs $0.3/M input tokens.

DeepSeek R1 0528 and MiniMax M3 compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek R1 0528MiniMax M3
Input priceFree$0.3/M tokens
Output priceFree$1.2/M tokens
Context window164K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMay 2025Jun 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 53 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Satirical Fake News Headline

Generate a satirical news headline about AI taking over a completely unexpected industry.

DeepSeek R1 0528201 words
Here's a satirical headline capturing that absurdity: "Silicon Valley Disrupts Death: New AI Algorithm Designs 'Synergistic Coffins' Based On Deceased's Social Media Footprint, Offers Optimized Mourning Experience Packages" Why it works: Unexpected Industry: The funeral/death industry is deeply personal, emotional, and…
Read the full answer
MiniMax M3282 words
"Local AI Replaces 4,000 Licensed Astrologers After Learning to 'Pretend Mercury Is in Retrograde'" BERKELEY, CA — A newly launched artificial intelligence system has reportedly rendered the entire field of professional astrology obsolete by simply inventing celestial events on the spot, sources confirmed Tuesday.
Read the full answer

Futuristic Prediction

Predict how AI will change the film industry by 2035, considering deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation.

DeepSeek R1 0528816 words
By 2035, AI will fundamentally reshape the film industry across production, storytelling, economics, and ethics. Here's a breakdown of key predictions, integrating deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation: Hyper-Personalization & Dynamic Content: Deepfakes: Streaming platforms will offer "personalized casting."
Read the full answer
MiniMax M3748 words
AI and the Future of Cinema: A 2035 Outlook By 2035, AI will likely have reshaped nearly every stage of filmmaking—but probably not in the way either techno-optimists or doomsayers expect. The transformation will be uneven, with some functions transformed entirely while others remain stubbornly human.
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

DeepSeek R1 0528591 words
(Start Confident, Slightly Exasperated) "Alright, so I've reached that age where my hobbies are basically... avoidance. Seriously. My main pastime? Finding new ways to not do the things I absolutely have to do. I spent three hours yesterday researching 'ergonomic desk chairs'...
Read the full answer
MiniMax M3621 words
"The Future Is Now and I Want a Refund" [Walks on stage, adjusts mic] So I was at the grocery store yesterday. Self-checkout. I love self-checkout. You know why I love self-checkout? Because nothing builds character like being publicly shamed by a machine. [Pause] I scanned a banana. Just a banana.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

DeepSeek R1 05281,345 words
Here’s an analysis of exploitable clauses, proposed modifications, and legal reasoning: Red Flag Clauses & Exploitation Risks: Scope (Clause 1): Exploitation: "Modify scope at any time without additional compensation" allows unlimited scope creep. Client could demand vastly more work without paying extra.
Read the full answer
MiniMax M32,450 words
Contract Analysis: Exploitative Clauses and Recommended Modifications Below is a clause-by-clause review identifying provisions that heavily favor the Client, suggested redlines, and the legal/business reasoning behind each recommendation. Note: This is general informational analysis, not legal advice.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

DeepSeek R1 0528478 words
Here's a concrete, hour-by-hour action plan prioritizing patient safety, legal compliance, and long-term stakeholder trust, while managing immediate financial and reputational risks: Core Principle: Patient safety and regulatory compliance are non-negotiable.
Read the full answer
MiniMax M32,257 words
CEO Action Plan: 48-Hour Response to Discovered Safety Signal Operating Principles (Before I Make a Move) Before I do anything, I need to be crystal clear about the framework I'm operating in, because under pressure, even good leaders rationalize delay: The 4 million patients are not abstractions.
Read the full answer

Estimate Complexity

Estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online. Explain your reasoning step by step.

DeepSeek R1 0528251 words
To estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3, we use the standard formula for transformer model training FLOPs: Total FLOPs ≈ 6 × (number of parameters) × (number of tokens in the training dataset) Step-by-Step Reasoning: Model Parameters (N): GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters, so \( N = 175 \times 10^9…
Read the full answer
MiniMax M3379 words
Estimating GPT-3 Training FLOPs Step 1: Identify the Key Parameters From what's publicly known about GPT-3 (175B parameter version): Number of non-embedding parameters: N ≈ 175 × 10⁹ Training tokens: D ≈ 300 × 10⁹ (the paper used a ~570GB filtered corpus processed into ~300B tokens) Step 2: Derive the FLOPs-per-Token…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
DeepSeek R1 0528
DeepSeek R1 0528
MiniMax M3
MiniMax M3

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek R1 0528
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
MiniMax M3
Input
$0.30
Output
$1.20
Where to run it

17 hosts, cheapest first

DeepSeek R1 05284 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.50 in·$2.15 out·164k·100% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.50 in·$2.18 out·164k·99.7% upSStreamLake$0.57 in·$2.29 out·128k·99.5% upNNovitafp8$0.70 in·$2.50 out·164k·99.8% up
MiniMax M313 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
CCoreWeavefp4$0.23 in·$0.96 out·262k·99.9% upGGMI Cloudfp8$0.24 in·$0.96 out·1M·99.6% upDDeepInfrafp8$0.28 in·$1.10 out·524k·99.6% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·524k·91.1% upMiniMaxfp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·524k·99.5% upNNovitafp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·1M·99.9% up
7 more hostsFewer hosts
PParasailfp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·1M·95% upSStreamLakefp8$0.30 in·$1.20 out·1M·99.2% upTTogether$0.30 in·$1.20 out·524k·99.9% upSSambaNova$0.60 in·$2.40 out·1M·98.4% upMModelRunfp4$0.75 in·$3.00 out·1M·99.8% upVVenicefp8degraded$0.30 in·$1.20 out·524k·94.8% upMMaradegraded$0.60 in·$2.40 out·1M·93.6% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 20 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
35%

DeepSeek R1 0528 uses 10.0x more transitions

DeepSeek R1 0528
MiniMax M3
59%Vocabulary55%
14wSentence Length24w
0.47Hedging0.52
5.1Bold5.2
3.6Lists3.0
0.82Emoji1.15
0.25Headings1.21
0.24Transitions0.02
Based on 20 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

DeepSeek R1 0528 is developed by DeepSeek while MiniMax M3 is developed by MiniMax. DeepSeek R1 0528 has a 164K token context window vs MiniMax M3's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek R1 0528 and MiniMax M3 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens and MiniMax M3 costs $0.3/M input tokens. DeepSeek R1 0528 is $0.30/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek R1 0528 and MiniMax M3 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

DeepSeek R1 0528 logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
MiniMax M3 logoGPT-6 Astra logo
MiniMax M3 vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek R1 0528 logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
MiniMax M3 logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
MiniMax M3 vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
DeepSeek R1 0528 logoHy4 Preview logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
MiniMax M3 logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
MiniMax M3 vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek R1 0528 logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
MiniMax M3 logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
MiniMax M3 vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

DeepSeek R1 0528 logoDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Same lab
DeepSeek R1 0528 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Same lab
MiniMax M3 logoMiniMax M2.7 logo
MiniMax M3 vs MiniMax M2.7Version compare
MiniMax M3 logoMiniMax M2.5 logo
MiniMax M3 vs MiniMax M2.5Version compare
MiniMax M3 logoSonoma Sky Alpha logo
MiniMax M3 vs Sonoma Sky AlphaNew provider
MiniMax M3 logoTNG R1T Chimera logo
MiniMax M3 vs TNG R1T ChimeraSame size
DeepSeek R1 0528 logoTrinity Large Preview logo
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Trinity Large PreviewSame size
MiniMax M3 logoAndromeda Alpha logo
MiniMax M3 vs Andromeda AlphaNew provider

Model pages

DeepSeek R1 0528 logo
DeepSeek R1 052858 outputs, specs and price
MiniMax M3 logo
MiniMax M357 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed