DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
Compare DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek against Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) by Qwen, context windows of 164K vs 1.0M, tested across 37 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)?
DeepSeek R1 0528 and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) are both competitive models. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens vs $0.4/M for Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking). Context windows: 164K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between DeepSeek R1 0528 and Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)
DeepSeek R1 0528 is made by deepseek while Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) is from qwen. DeepSeek R1 0528 has a 164K token context window compared to Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)'s 1000K. On pricing, DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens vs $0.4/M for Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking).
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Style Comparison
Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) uses 34.0x more emoji
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
