DeepSeek R1 0528
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Qwen3 235B A22B
Compare DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek against Qwen3 235B A22B by Qwen, in 5 community votes, deepseek r1 0528 wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 164K vs 33K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Qwen3 235B A22B?
DeepSeek R1 0528 is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 5 blind community votes on Rival. Context windows: 164K vs 33K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between DeepSeek R1 0528 and Qwen3 235B A22B
DeepSeek R1 0528 is made by deepseek while Qwen3 235B A22B is from qwen. DeepSeek R1 0528 has a 164K token context window compared to Qwen3 235B A22B's 33K. In community voting, In 5 community votes, DeepSeek R1 0528 wins 100% of head-to-head duels.
In 5 community votes, DeepSeek R1 0528 wins 100% of head-to-head duels. DeepSeek R1 0528 leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 5+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Image Generation: DeepSeek R1 0528 wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
DeepSeek R1 0528Winner
Qwen3 235B A22BRunner-up
Pick DeepSeek R1 0528. In 5 blind votes, DeepSeek R1 0528 wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
DeepSeek R1 0528 particularly excels in Image Generation.
Clear winner
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
97%
DeepSeek R1 0528 uses 29.5x more hedging
DeepSeek R1 0528
Qwen3 235B A22B
64%Vocabulary68%
10wSentence Length9w
0.30Hedging0.00
6.8Bold5.8
4.9Lists3.7
0.00Emoji0.74
0.40Headings0.00
0.00Transitions0.12
Based on 4 + 2 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ