DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Qwen3 Coder Flash
Compare DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek against Qwen3 Coder Flash by Qwen, context windows of 164K vs 128K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
DeepSeek R1 0528
Qwen3 Coder FlashRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, DeepSeek R1 0528 has the edge — bigger model tier, major provider backing.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
DeepSeek R1 0528
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Input
$0.30
Output
$1.50
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
49%
Qwen3 Coder Flash uses 18.4x more transitions
DeepSeek R1 0528
Qwen3 Coder Flash
64%Vocabulary60%
10wSentence Length92w
0.30Hedging0.60
6.8Bold6.1
4.9Lists6.2
0.00Emoji0.00
0.40Headings1.64
0.00Transitions0.18
Based on 4 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
