DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking

Compare DeepSeek R1 0528 by DeepSeek against Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking by Qwen, context windows of 164K vs 262K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 0528 or Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking?

DeepSeek R1 0528 and Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking are both competitive models. DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens vs $1.2/M for Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking. Context windows: 164K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between DeepSeek R1 0528 and Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking

DeepSeek R1 0528 is made by deepseek while Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking is from qwen. DeepSeek R1 0528 has a 164K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking's 262K. On pricing, DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens vs $1.2/M for Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking.

Our Verdict
DeepSeek R1 0528
DeepSeek R1 0528
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking

No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.

Too close to call
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
87%

Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking uses 137.1x more emoji

DeepSeek R1 0528
Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking
64%Vocabulary61%
10wSentence Length15w
0.30Hedging0.23
6.8Bold5.2
4.9Lists3.9
0.00Emoji1.37
0.40Headings1.22
0.00Transitions0.04
Based on 4 + 13 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

DeepSeek R1 0528Qwen: Qwen3 Max Thinking

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions