Rival
Sign Up

DeepSeek R1 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B

Compare DeepSeek R1 by DeepSeek against Google: Gemma 4 31B by Google AI, context windows of 128K vs 262K, tested across 44 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 or Google: Gemma 4 31B?

DeepSeek R1 and Google: Gemma 4 31B are both competitive models. DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. Context windows: 128K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between DeepSeek R1 and Google: Gemma 4 31B

DeepSeek R1 is made by deepseek while Google: Gemma 4 31B is from google. DeepSeek R1 has a 128K token context window compared to Google: Gemma 4 31B's 262K. On pricing, DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B.

Our Verdict
Google: Gemma 4 31B
Google: Gemma 4 31B
DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1Runner-up

No community votes yet. On paper, Google: Gemma 4 31B has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.

Google: Gemma 4 31B is 5.5x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.

Slight edge
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
89%

Google: Gemma 4 31B uses 5.5x more emoji

DeepSeek R1
Google: Gemma 4 31B
62%Vocabulary57%
15wSentence Length18w
0.52Hedging0.37
8.0Bold7.1
5.7Lists4.0
0.04Emoji0.24
0.62Headings0.94
0.28Transitions0.16
Based on 22 + 23 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

DeepSeek R1Google: Gemma 4 31B
FAQ
Keep going
DeepSeek R1 logoGPT-5 logo
DeepSeek R1 vs GPT-5New provider
DeepSeek R1 logoMiniMax M2.5 logo
DeepSeek R1 vs MiniMax M2.5New provider
DeepSeek R1 logoPony Alpha logo
DeepSeek R1 vs Pony AlphaNew provider