DeepSeek R1 vs Google: Gemma 4 31B
Compare DeepSeek R1 by DeepSeek against Google: Gemma 4 31B by Google AI, in 10 community votes, google: gemma 4 31b wins 70% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 128K vs 262K, tested across 44 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 or Google: Gemma 4 31B?
Google: Gemma 4 31B is the better choice overall, winning 70% of 10 blind community votes on Rival. DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. Context windows: 128K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between DeepSeek R1 and Google: Gemma 4 31B
DeepSeek R1 is made by deepseek while Google: Gemma 4 31B is from google. DeepSeek R1 has a 128K token context window compared to Google: Gemma 4 31B's 262K. On pricing, DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. In community voting, In 10 community votes, Google: Gemma 4 31B wins 70% of head-to-head duels.
In 10 community votes, Google: Gemma 4 31B wins 70% of head-to-head duels. DeepSeek R1 leads in Web Design, while Google: Gemma 4 31B leads in Reasoning, Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 10+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Per 1M tokens
Google: Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on both — 3.9× input, 5.5× output
Pick Google: Gemma 4 31B. In 10 blind votes, Google: Gemma 4 31B wins 70% of the time. That's not luck.
Pick DeepSeek R1 for Web Design. Pick Google: Gemma 4 31B for Reasoning, Image Generation. Google: Gemma 4 31B is 5.5x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Google: Gemma 4 31B uses 5.5x more emoji
