DeepSeek R1
Nothing here. The model returned empty. We stared at it for a while.
DeepSeek R1 vs GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
Compare DeepSeek R1 by DeepSeek against GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini by OpenAI, context windows of 128K vs 400K, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 or GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini?
DeepSeek R1 and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini are both competitive models. DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini. Context windows: 128K vs 400K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between DeepSeek R1 and GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
DeepSeek R1 is made by deepseek while GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini is from openai. DeepSeek R1 has a 128K token context window compared to GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini's 400K. On pricing, DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini.
Our Verdict
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
DeepSeek R1Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Slight edge
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
94%
DeepSeek R1 uses 4.3x more emoji
DeepSeek R1
GPT-5.1-Codex-Mini
62%Vocabulary65%
15wSentence Length20w
0.52Hedging0.56
8.0Bold3.3
5.7Lists3.4
0.04Emoji0.00
0.62Headings0.08
0.28Transitions0.05
Based on 22 + 13 text responses
vsAsk them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ