DeepSeek R1 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Compare DeepSeek R1 by DeepSeek against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking by Qwen, context windows of 128K vs 66K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, DeepSeek R1 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?
DeepSeek R1 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking are both competitive models. DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking. Context windows: 128K vs 66K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between DeepSeek R1 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
DeepSeek R1 is made by deepseek while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is from qwen. DeepSeek R1 has a 128K token context window compared to Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's 66K. On pricing, DeepSeek R1 costs $0.55/M input tokens vs $0.15/M for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking.
Per 1M tokens
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper on both — 3.7× input, 1.5× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Style Comparison
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 13.4x more emoji
