Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. DeepSeek V3.2 SpecialevsGrok 4.7
Updated Sep 2026

DeepSeek V3.2 SpecialevsGrok 4.7

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale is cheaper than Grok 4.7 at $0.28/M vs $1.6/M input tokens.

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale and Grok 4.7 compared across 10 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeGrok 4.7
Input price$0.28/M tokens$1.6/M tokens
Output price$0.42/M tokens$4.8/M tokens
Context window131K tokens500K tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedDec 2025Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 5 of the 10 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale2,320 words
We need to generate three explanations for how a large language model learns and generates text, each tailored to a different audience: experienced software engineer (no ML), PhD physicist (mathematical precision), and venture capitalist (business evaluation). Each explanation should be 2-3 paragraphs.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.71,173 words
1. Experienced software engineer An LLM is a stateless function from a token sequence to a probability distribution over the next token. Training is a giant batch job: you stream text, run a forward pass, compare the predicted distribution to the actual next token with cross-entropy, and push gradients through billions…
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale170 words
"Honey-Lemon Bliss Bites" A sweet, tangy, and chewy treat that’s quick to make with pantry staples! Ingredients: 1 cup rolled oats 1/4 cup honey 2 tbsp peanut butter (or any nut/seed butter) 1 tbsp lemon zest (or 1 tsp lemon juice) 1/4 tsp vanilla extract 1/4 cup shredded coconut (optional, for coating) A pinch of salt…
Read the full answer
Grok 4.7129 words
Pantry Gold Honey Biscuits A sweet, buttery, slightly salty biscuit that tastes like it took more effort than it did. Ingredients (7) 2 cups all-purpose flour 1 tbsp baking powder ½ tsp salt ¼ cup sugar ½ cup butter (cold) ¾ cup milk 2 tbsp honey Time: about 10 minutes prep, 12–15 minutes bake Instructions Heat the…
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale7,492 words
We need to analyze the given architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor, similar to Google Docs. The description includes components, data flow, sync strategy, and scaling plan. We are asked to identify potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.71,399 words
This design will lose edits, split users into inconsistent views, and fall over under concurrent writing. The core problems are clock-based conflict resolution, per-server WebSocket fan-out, polling as the sync path, and treating documents as full HTML snapshots.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale377 words
Here’s a simple, actionable 1-month plan focusing on diet, exercise, and sleep to kickstart your journey toward better health and longevity. Each area includes beginner-friendly tips to ensure consistency and progress. 1. Diet: Nourish Your Body Goal: Develop healthier eating habits and reduce processed foods.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.7442 words
1-month beginner plan for better health and longevity Focus on three foundations: nutrition, movement, and sleep. Aim for consistency over perfection. If you have a medical condition, check with a clinician before big changes. Week-by-week rhythm Week 1: Build awareness and one easy habit in each area.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale2,470 words
We are to identify the three weakest claims in the pitch deck summary, explain why they're weak using specific evidence or logical reasoning, and suggest how to strengthen each one with concrete improvements.
Read the full answer
Grok 4.7599 words
Three weakest claims 1. “Predict what you want to type before you think it” (Slide 1) This is scientifically incoherent, not just ambitious. Non-invasive EEG decodes neural activity that is already underway (motor imagery, attempted speech, attention).
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
DeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Grok 4.7 has the edge: newer, bigger context window.

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale costs 11x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale
Input
$0.28
5.7× cheaper
Output
$0.42
11× cheaper
Grok 4.7
Input
$1.60
Output
$4.80

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale is cheaper on both: 5.7× input, 11× output.

Where to run it

1 host

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Grok 4.71 host
HostInOutContextUptime
xAI$1.60 in·$4.80 out·500k·98.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale is developed by DeepSeek while Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI. DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale has a 131K token context window vs Grok 4.7's 500K. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale and Grok 4.7 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale costs $0.28/M input tokens and Grok 4.7 costs $1.6/M input tokens. DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale is $1.32/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale and Grok 4.7 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale logoHy3 logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Grok 4.7 vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Grok 4.7 vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale logoGLM 5.3 logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Grok 4.7 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Grok 4.7 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale logoDeepSeek V4.1 Flash logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashSame lab
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale logoDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.6 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.6Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoGrok 4.5 logo
Grok 4.7 vs Grok 4.5Same lab
Grok 4.7 logoMiniMax M1 logo
Grok 4.7 vs MiniMax M1New provider
Grok 4.7 logoMiniMax M2 logo
Grok 4.7 vs MiniMax M2New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale logoMiniMax M2-her logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale vs MiniMax M2-herSame size
Grok 4.7 logoMiniMax M2.1 logo
Grok 4.7 vs MiniMax M2.1Same size

Model pages

DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale logo
DeepSeek V3.2 Speciale55 outputs, specs and price
Grok 4.7 logo
Grok 4.710 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed