DeepSeek V3.2vsGPT-5.1-Codex
DeepSeek V3.2 is cheaper than GPT-5.1-Codex at $0.28/M vs $1.25/M input tokens.
| Spec | DeepSeek V3.2 | GPT-5.1-Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.28/M tokens | $1.25/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.42/M tokens | $10/M tokens |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 400K tokens |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Nov 2025 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.1% | 73.7% |
Our Verdict
GPT-5.1-Codex
DeepSeek V3.2Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.1-Codex has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.
DeepSeek V3.2 costs 24x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
DeepSeek V3.2
Input
$0.28
4.5× cheaper
Output
$0.42
24× cheaper
GPT-5.1-Codex
Input
$1.25
Output
$10.00
DeepSeek V3.2 is cheaper on both — 4.5× input, 24× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
38%
GPT-5.1-Codex uses 2.9x more transitions
DeepSeek V3.2
GPT-5.1-Codex
52%Vocabulary70%
31wSentence Length17w
0.58Hedging0.39
6.3Bold3.4
5.4Lists3.5
0.00Emoji0.00
0.80Headings0.50
0.13Transitions0.38
Based on 24 + 14 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
DeepSeek V3.2 vs MiniMax M3New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Opus 4New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 vs GLM 4.5 AirNew provider
GPT-5.1-Codex vs GLM 4.6New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 vs GLM 4.7New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 vs GLM 4.7 FlashNew provider