DeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-5.6 Luna
Compare DeepSeek V3.2 by DeepSeek against GPT-5.6 Luna by OpenAI, context windows of 131K vs 1.1M, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V3.2
GPT-5.6 Luna
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
DeepSeek V3.2 is 14x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
DeepSeek V3.2
Input
$0.28
3.6× cheaper
Output
$0.42
14× cheaper
GPT-5.6 Luna
Input
$1.00
Output
$6.00
DeepSeek V3.2 is cheaper on both — 3.6× input, 14× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
56%
DeepSeek V3.2 uses 2.3x more bold
DeepSeek V3.2
GPT-5.6 Luna
52%Vocabulary59%
31wSentence Length19w
0.58Hedging0.84
6.3Bold2.7
5.4Lists4.5
0.00Emoji0.00
0.80Headings1.20
0.13Transitions0.10
Based on 24 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
