DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2
Compare DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 by DeepSeek against Z.ai: GLM 5.2 by Zhipu AI, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 42 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Z.ai: GLM 5.2
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 16x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Input
$0.14
10.0× cheaper
Output
$0.28
16× cheaper
Z.ai: GLM 5.2
Input
$1.40
Output
$4.40
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper on both — 10.0× input, 16× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
64%
Z.ai: GLM 5.2 uses 6.5x more transitions
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Z.ai: GLM 5.2
52%Vocabulary56%
18wSentence Length18w
0.38Hedging0.27
5.7Bold3.7
3.4Lists2.8
0.00Emoji0.00
0.83Headings0.56
0.04Transitions0.24
Based on 23 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
