DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Llama 4 Maverick
Compare DeepSeek V4 Flash by DeepSeek against Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Llama 4 Maverick?
DeepSeek V4 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick are both competitive models. DeepSeek V4 Flash costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick. Context windows: 1049K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between DeepSeek V4 Flash and Llama 4 Maverick
DeepSeek V4 Flash is made by deepseek while Llama 4 Maverick is from meta. DeepSeek V4 Flash has a 1049K token context window compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1000K. On pricing, DeepSeek V4 Flash costs $0.14/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick.
Per 1M tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper on both — 11× input, 8.9× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
DeepSeek V4 Flash is 8.9x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Llama 4 Maverick uses 2.4x more lists
