DeepSeek V4 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5
Compare DeepSeek V4 Flash by DeepSeek against MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi, in 18 community votes, mimo-v2.5 wins 55% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Web Design: MiMo-V2.5 wins 71% of votes
Reasoning: DeepSeek V4 Flash wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
MiMo-V2.5Winner
DeepSeek V4 FlashRunner-up
MiMo-V2.5 has the edge overall. In 18 blind votes, MiMo-V2.5 wins 55% of the time.
Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash for Reasoning. Pick MiMo-V2.5 for Web Design. DeepSeek V4 Flash is 7.1x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Input
$0.14
2.9× cheaper
Output
$0.28
7.1× cheaper
MiMo-V2.5
Input
$0.40
Output
$2.00
DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper on both — 2.9× input, 7.1× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
43%
MiMo-V2.5 uses 100.6x more emoji
DeepSeek V4 Flash
MiMo-V2.5
54%Vocabulary57%
17wSentence Length17w
0.52Hedging0.64
3.6Bold5.9
2.6Lists2.8
0.00Emoji1.01
0.41Headings1.07
0.19Transitions0.07
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
