DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare DeepSeek V4 Flash by DeepSeek against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 131K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Input
$0.14
Output
$0.28
2.1× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
1.3× cheaper
Output
$0.60
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins input (1.3× cheaper)·DeepSeek V4 Flash wins output (2.1× cheaper)
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
36%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 53.9x more emoji
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
54%Vocabulary56%
17wSentence Length14w
0.52Hedging0.37
3.6Bold5.7
2.6Lists4.0
0.00Emoji0.54
0.41Headings0.70
0.19Transitions0.14
Based on 27 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
