DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare DeepSeek V4 Pro by DeepSeek against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 131K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, DeepSeek V4 Pro has the edge — newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 5.8x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Input
$1.74
Output
$3.48
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
16× cheaper
Output
$0.60
5.8× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 16× input, 5.8× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
29%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 15.4x more emoji
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
57%Vocabulary56%
18wSentence Length14w
0.52Hedging0.37
3.3Bold5.7
2.3Lists4.0
0.04Emoji0.54
0.45Headings0.70
0.15Transitions0.14
Based on 27 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
