What is the difference between DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Ling 3.0 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is developed by DeepSeek while Ling 3.0 Flash is developed by inclusionAI. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has a 1.0M token context window vs Ling 3.0 Flash's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 6 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Ling 3.0 Flash?

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Ling 3.0 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 6 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost compared to Ling 3.0 Flash?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash costs $0.15/M input tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.021/M input tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash is $0.13/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Ling 3.0 Flash on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Ling 3.0 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Sep 2026

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashvsLing 3.0 Flash

Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash at $0.021/M vs $0.15/M input tokens.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Ling 3.0 Flash compared across 6 shared prompts
Spec	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash	Ling 3.0 Flash
Input price	$0.15/M tokens	$0.021/M tokens
Output price	$0.6/M tokens	$0.063/M tokens
Context window	1.0M tokens	262K tokens
Weights	Open	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	No	No
Released	Sep 2026	Jul 2026

Our Verdict

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Ling 3.0 Flash

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Ling 3.0 Flash costs 9.5x less per token.

Too close to call

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

Input

$0.15

Output

$0.60

Ling 3.0 Flash

Input

$0.02

7.1× cheaper

Output

$0.06

9.5× cheaper

Ling 3.0 Flash is cheaper on both: 7.1× input, 9.5× output.

Where to run it

24 hosts, cheapest first

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash22 hosts

HostInOutContextUptime

Morph$0.12 in$0.48 out1M98.2% up Relacefp4$0.13 in$0.52 out1M99.9% up DeepInfrafp8$0.14 in$0.42 out1M99.7% up Alibaba Cloud$0.15 in$0.60 out1M99.9% up DeepSeek$0.15 in$0.60 out1M100% up StreamLakefp8$0.15 in$0.60 out1M99.5% up

16 more hosts

Ling 3.0 Flash2 hosts

HostInOutContextUptime

Novita$0.02 in$0.06 out262k100% up DeepInfrabf16$0.06 in$0.18 out131k99.6% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 22 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Cost per 1M tokens

24 hosts, cheapest first

What we learned reading every model

Common questions

What is the difference between DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Ling 3.0 Flash?

Which is better, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Ling 3.0 Flash?

How much does DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost compared to Ling 3.0 Flash?

How can I compare DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Ling 3.0 Flash on Rival?

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Same lab, same size, long tail

Model pages

Cost per 1M tokens

24 hosts, cheapest first

What we learned reading every model

Common questions

What is the difference between DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Ling 3.0 Flash?

Which is better, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Ling 3.0 Flash?

How much does DeepSeek V4.1 Flash cost compared to Ling 3.0 Flash?

How can I compare DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Ling 3.0 Flash on Rival?

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Same lab, same size, long tail

Model pages