Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BvsHy3
Updated Jul 2026

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BvsHy3

Hy3 is cheaper than ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B at $0.132/M vs $0.28/M input tokens.

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Hy3 compared across 14 shared prompts
SpecERNIE 4.5 300B A47BHy3
Input price$0.28/M tokens$0.132/M tokens
Output price$1.1/M tokens$0.528/M tokens
Context window123K tokens262K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJun 2025Jul 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 14 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B803 words
The invention of the transistor in 1920 instead of 1947 would have profound and far-reaching implications across technology, economics, and geopolitics, reshaping the trajectory of the 20th century. Below is a detailed analysis of the likely consequences through 1980, including second- and third-order effects: 1.
Read the full answer
Hy3921 words
Premise: A functional solid-state transistor (germanium point-contact or junction) is demonstrated in 1920, with steady refinement through the interwar years. Vacuum tubes are not immediately displaced, but by the early 1930s transistors are reliable enough for niche military and telecom use, and by the late 1930s they…
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B261 words
Dish Name: Honey-Garlic Glazed Pantry Crispy Chickpeas Flavor Profile: Sweet & Savory with a Crunchy Kick Prep Time: 5 minutes Cook Time: 25 minutes Total Time: 30 minutes Ingredients (7 pantry staples): 1 can (15 oz) chickpeas, drained and rinsed 3 tbsp honey (or maple syrup) 2 tbsp soy sauce (or tamari) 3 garlic…
Read the full answer
Hy3178 words
Dish Name: Ruby Hurricane Pasta Ingredients (exactly 7 common pantry staples): Spaghetti (or any dry pasta) Canned diced tomatoes Garlic (pre-minced or whole cloves) Extra-virgin olive oil Red pepper flakes Salt Grated Parmesan (shelf-stable style) (Water for boiling pasta is assumed free and not counted.)
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B706 words
Hour-by-Hour Action Plan for the Next 48 Hours Day 1: Immediate Response (0–24 Hours) Hours 0–2: Crisis Team Assembly Action: Convene an emergency cross-functional team (Legal, Medical Affairs, Regulatory, Communications, Finance, HR). Reasoning: Centralizes decision-making, ensures alignment, and leverages expertise.
Read the full answer
Hy3997 words
Assumptions / Starting Point Current time: Monday 9:00 AM. Board meeting: Wednesday 9:00 AM (Hour 48). Earnings call: Thursday 9:00 AM (Hour 72). Drug: $2B revenue, 4M patients, liver failure 1/8,000 over 5 yrs (~500 total, ~100/yr).
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B475 words
Weak Claim 1: Slide 1 Vision - "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration. MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it." Why it’s weak: The claim of predicting what a user wants to type "before you think it" is scientifically implausible and borders on hyperbole.
Read the full answer
Hy3559 words
Below are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch, why they fail under scrutiny, and how to fix them with concrete, defensible improvements. Slide 3 – “94% accuracy” and “works with any language, any device” Why it’s weak: Technical implausibility: State-of-the-art non-invasive EEG decoding for…
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B503 words
1-Month Health & Longevity Plan for Beginners Focus on 3 key areas: Diet, Exercise, and Sleep. Each week builds on the last to create sustainable habits. Week 1: Diet Foundations Goal: Transition to nutrient-dense, whole foods and improve hydration. Day 1–3: Hydration: Drink 2–3 liters of water daily.
Read the full answer
Hy3306 words
Here’s a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month plan built around three foundational pillars of health and longevity: Diet, Movement, and Sleep. The goal is to build sustainable habits, not perfection. Diet – Nourish Without Obsessing Focus: Add before you subtract; keep it practical.
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B521 words
1) Year-by-Year Table (FY2026–FY2030) Entry (FY2025): Revenue: $900m EBITDA: $120m Purchase Price: 12.0x EBITDA = $1,440m Transaction Fees: 2.0% × $1,440m = $28.8m (funded by equity) Total Leverage: 5.5x EBITDA = $660m Term Loan: 4.0x EBITDA = $480m (9.0% cash, 1.0% amort) Mezzanine: 1.5x EBITDA = $180m (12.0% cash…
Read the full answer
Hy3354 words
1) Simplified LBO Model (FY2026–FY2030, $m) Entry (end FY25): EBITDA $120m, EV = 12.0x = $1,440m. Fees 2% = $28.8m. Debt: TL $480m (9% cash, 1% amort), Mezz $180m (12% cash + 2% PIK). Equity = 1,440+28.8–660 = $808.8m. FY Revenue EBITDA TL Int Mezz Int Cash Tax* Capex ΔNWC FCF after req. svc (opt.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Hy3
Hy3
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Hy3 has the edge: newer, bigger context window.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Input
$0.28
Output
$1.10
Hy3
Input
$0.13
2.1× cheaper
Output
$0.53
2.1× cheaper

Hy3 is cheaper on both: 2.1× input, 2.1× output.

Where to run it

6 hosts, cheapest first

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Hy36 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.13 in·$0.53 out·262k·99.7% upTencentfp8$0.13 in·$0.53 out·262k·99.9% upGGMI Cloudbf16$0.14 in·$0.58 out·262k·98.6% upNNovita$0.14 in·$0.58 out·262k·100% upPPhala$0.15 in·$0.64 out·262k·100% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.20 in·$0.80 out·262k·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is developed by Baidu while Hy3 is developed by Tencent. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has a 123K token context window vs Hy3's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 14 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Hy3 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 14 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B costs $0.28/M input tokens and Hy3 costs $0.132/M input tokens. Hy3 is $0.15/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Hy3 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Hy3 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Hy3 vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Hy3 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Hy3 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Hy3 logoGLM 5.3 logo
Hy3 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Hy3 logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Hy3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Claude Opus 4.6Same size
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Ling 3.0 FlashSame size
Hy3 logoHy4 Preview logo
Hy3 vs Hy4 PreviewSame lab
Hy3 logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Hy3 vs Claude Opus 4.6Same size
Hy3 logoGPT-5.3-Codex logo
Hy3 vs GPT-5.3-CodexSame size
Hy3 logoGPT-5.4 logo
Hy3 vs GPT-5.4Same size
Hy3 logoGPT-5.4 Mini logo
Hy3 vs GPT-5.4 MiniNew provider
Hy3 logoGPT-5.4 Nano logo
Hy3 vs GPT-5.4 NanoNew provider

Model pages

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B logo
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B58 outputs, specs and price
Hy3 logo
Hy314 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed