ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs MiMo-V2.5
Compare ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B by Baidu against MiMo-V2.5 by Xiaomi, context windows of 123K vs 1.0M, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
MiMo-V2.5
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
Input
$0.28
1.4× cheaper
Output
$1.10
1.8× cheaper
MiMo-V2.5
Input
$0.40
Output
$2.00
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper on both — 1.4× input, 1.8× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
75%
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B uses 2.3x more transitions
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B
MiMo-V2.5
56%Vocabulary57%
18wSentence Length17w
0.63Hedging0.64
5.3Bold5.9
4.3Lists2.8
0.94Emoji1.01
0.67Headings1.07
0.15Transitions0.07
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
