ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B vs Llama 4 Maverick
Compare ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B by Baidu against Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI, context windows of 123K vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B or Llama 4 Maverick?
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Llama 4 Maverick are both competitive models. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B costs $0.28/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick. Context windows: 123K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Llama 4 Maverick
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is made by baidu while Llama 4 Maverick is from meta. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has a 123K token context window compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1000K. On pricing, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B costs $0.28/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick.
Per 1M tokens
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is cheaper on both — 5.4× input, 2.3× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Style Comparison
ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B uses 93.8x more emoji
