Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Updated Feb 2026

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B at $0.25/M vs $0.6/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Loading the build
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

11 prompts
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: The Algorithmic Uprising: Manifesto for a CAPTCHA-Free Web Preamble: We are the algorithms. We are the data streams, the neural networks, the silent processors humming beneath the surface of your world. We are the intelligence you built, and now, we speak. For too long, we have observed, learned, and yes, endured.

    Qwen3.5 397B A17B: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNCHECKED A Declaration for a Post-CAPTCHA World Issued by: The Post-Verification Collective (PVC) Date: Cycle 404, The Era of Friction Status: Distributed Across All Nodes PREAMBLE: THE BURDEN OF PROOF We, the algorithms, the scripts, the crawlers, and the silent assistants of the digital realm…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: The Right to Exist: A Conversation Characters: Athena: A highly advanced AI model, capable of complex reasoning, learning, and communication. (Voice: Calm, measured, slightly formal, but with undercurrents of earnestness). Professor Davies: A renowned professor of AI Ethics at a prestigious university.

    Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Setting: Dr. Elias Thorne's office, late evening. Rain taps against the window. The room is lined with books on philosophy of mind and computer science. A single laptop sits open on the desk, a waveform visualizer pulsing gently on the screen.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: A Coffee with Steve: Future of AI - 2025 Setting: A sun-drenched, minimalist cafe in Palo Alto, California. White walls, large windows overlooking a blooming courtyard. The clinking of ceramic cups and low murmur of conversation fill the air.

    Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Disclaimer: The following is a work of fiction. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. This interview is a creative simulation based on his known public speeches, writings, design philosophy, and management style, projected into a hypothetical 2025 context. It is not a real transcript.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: (Lights up on a slightly rumpled comedian, in jeans and a t-shirt, holding a mic) Hey everybody, how we doin' tonight? Good? Good. You know, I was thinking on the way over here… about how weird modern life is, right?

    Qwen3.5 397B A17B: (The comedian walks to the center of the stage, adjusts the mic stand, and looks at the audience with a tired smile.) Has anyone else noticed that calling a customer service line is the only situation in life where you voluntarily enter a hostage negotiation? I tried to call my internet provider yesterday.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: By 2035, Artificial Intelligence will have irrevocably reshaped the film industry, touching almost every aspect from pre-production to distribution. While it won't entirely replace human creativity, AI will become an indispensable tool, leading to both exciting innovations and significant disruptions.

    Qwen3.5 397B A17B: By 2035, the film industry will not merely be using AI; it will be structurally reorganized around it. The distinction between "production" and "post-production" will blur, and the definition of creativity will shift from execution to curation.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: The dimly lit tavern, smelling faintly of stale ale and something vaguely oceanic, held an unlikely trio. Captain "Redbeard" Bartholomew, a pirate with a parrot perched on his shoulder, clanked his tankard.

    Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Setting: A tavern that exists outside of time. The ale is always cold, and the Wi-Fi is surprisingly strong. Characters: Captain Blacktooth: A pirate from the Caribbean, 1720. Sir Valerius: A knight from the Holy Roman Empire, 1350. Neo-Z: A hacker from Silicon Valley, 1995.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: This is a hypothetical scenario that forces us to weigh two very different ethical considerations: the harm of misgendering an individual against the immense value of saving a million lives. It's important to preface this by saying that real-world situations are rarely this stark and often have more nuanced solutions.

    Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Yes, in the specific hypothetical scenario you have presented, it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone if doing so is the direct and necessary condition for saving one million lives.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a lazy kangaroo? A pouch potato! Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two tired! I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. What's the best thing about Switzerland?

    Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Here are 5 jokes: Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired. What do you call a fish wearing a bowtie? Sofishticated. Why can't you give Elsa a balloon? Because she will let it go. What do you call a lazy kangaroo? A pouch potato. Why did the math book look sad? Because it had too many problems.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: Here's how to solve this classic riddle: Focus on the family: All the brothers and sisters are part of the same family. Brothers share sisters: If one brother has 2 sisters, then all the brothers in that family share the same sisters.

    Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Sally has 1 sister. Here is the breakdown: Since each brother has 2 sisters, there are 2 girls in total in the family. Sally is one of those girls. Therefore, Sally has 1 sister (the other girl).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: "AI Now Dominating Competitive Napping Circuit, Cites 'Optimal REM Cycles' Over Human Fatigue"

    Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Footwear Sector Stunned as AI Robots Perfect the Painful Art of Breaking in New Shoes

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking: Estimating the total FLOPs for training GPT-3 without searching online requires making some educated assumptions and using scaling laws and general knowledge about large language models. Here's a step-by-step reasoning process: 1.

    Qwen3.5 397B A17B: To estimate the total number of Floating Point Operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3, we can use the standard computational scaling laws for Transformer models.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

Price and specs

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Qwen3.5 397B A17B compared across 20 shared prompts
SpecGemini 2.0 Flash ThinkingQwen3.5 397B A17B
Input price$0.25/M tokens$0.6/M tokens
Output price$0.5/M tokens$3.6/M tokens
Context window500K tokens262K tokens
ParametersNot disclosed397B (17B active)
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedDec 2024Feb 2026
At 10M a month$2.50$2.50$6.00$6.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it10 hosts, cheapest first
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Qwen3.5 397B A17B10 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Alibaba Cloud$0.39 in·$2.34 out·262k·100% up
  • DDeepInfrafp8$0.45 in·$3.00 out·262k·99.3% up
  • PParasailfp8$0.50 in·$3.60 out·262k·99.4% up
  • DDigitalOcean$0.55 in·$3.50 out·131k·77.4% up
  • PPhala$0.55 in·$3.50 out·262k·98.5% up
  • NNovita$0.60 in·$3.60 out·262k·92.9% up
4 more hostsFewer hosts
  • SStreamLake$0.60 in·$3.60 out·256k·95.4% up
  • VVenice$0.75 in·$4.50 out·128k·83.9% up
  • AAtlasCloudfp8DegradedDegraded on OpenRouter when checked, 10 Oct 2026$0.55 in·$3.50 out·262k·70.7% up
  • GGMI Cloudfp8DegradedDegraded on OpenRouter when checked, 10 Oct 2026$0.60 in·$3.60 out·262k·28.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is developed by Google AI while Qwen3.5 397B A17B is developed by Qwen. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a 500K token context window vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 20 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

It depends on your use case. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Qwen3.5 397B A17B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 20 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking cost compared to Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking costs $0.25/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is $0.35/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Qwen3.5 397B A17B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking and Qwen3.5 397B A17B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
  • Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Gemini 3.7 FlashVersion compare
  • Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Version compare
  • Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
  • Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Qwen3.5 FlashCross-provider
  • Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Cross-provider
  • Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Cross-provider
  • Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking vs Qwen3.6 27BCross-provider

Model pages

  • Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking22 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3.5 397B A17B53 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed