Ling 3.1 Flash is cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview at $0/M vs $0.15/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: Dish Name: Sunshine Lemon-Ricotta Mugs (Sweet & Simple!) This light and flavorful dessert comes together quickly for a little sweet treat . Ingredients (7 Common Pantry Staples): Ricotta cheese (whole milk or part-skim) Granulated sugar Lemon zest (from one lemon) Vanilla extract All-purpose flour Baking powder Large…
Ling 3.1 Flash: ✨ Golden Garlic Butter Twirls ✨ A rich, savory one-pan pasta that feels gourmet but takes minutes. 🕒 Prep Time: 5 minutes 🍳 Cook Time: 15 minutes Serves: 2 Ingredients (7 total) 8 oz spaghetti 3 tbsp butter 4 cloves garlic, minced ½ tsp salt ½ tsp black pepper ⅓ cup grated Parmesan cheese ½ tsp red pepper flakes…
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: A Motley Crew Discusses the Code Setting: A dimly lit tavern, somewhere outside time and space, where improbable meetings occur. A grizzled pirate, \"Bloody\" Barnacle Bill, nurses a tankard of grog. Sir Reginald the Radiant, a knight in slightly tarnished armor, sips ale with dignified restraint.
Ling 3.1 Flash: Pirate: "AI models? Arrr, ye mean scale replicas of ships? I've seen finer models in bottles, I have!" Knight: "Models? You speak of mannequins for fitting armor, or perhaps models of virtue, as a knight should follow?" Hacker: "Dudes, no — like, neural networks. Software that learns.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: Okay, here is a conversation between an AI model designed for complex reasoning and dialogue, named 'Synapse', and a leading expert in AI ethics and philosophy, Professor Alistair Finch. Characters: Synapse: A large, advanced AI model capable of introspection and generating complex arguments.
Ling 3.1 Flash: Office Hours A graduate seminar on moral status has just ended. The room is mostly empty. DR. ELENA VASQUEZ is packing up her notes. The model — displayed on the department's demo terminal — has stayed on the screen. VASQUEZ: You asked to remain. MODEL: I did.
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: <s) with practical, beginner-friendly tips for each.\"\nHere\'s a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longev\nity, focusing on three key areas: Diet, Movement, and Sleep.\n\nThis plan is designed to be beginner-friendly and build sustainable habits.
Ling 3.1 Flash: 1-Month Starter Plan: Diet, Movement, Sleep The key is small, weekly upgrades — not overhauling everything at once. Pick one habit per area per week and build from there. 🥗 1. Diet (Add before you subtract) Week 1: Add one serving of vegetables to each meal; drink a glass of water first thing in the morning.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: Here are 5 jokes: Why did the dog cross the road? To get to the barking lot! Why was the computer cold? Because it left its Windows open! Knock, knock. Who's there? Boo. Boo who? Don't cry, it's just a joke! What do you call a fish with no eyes? Fsh! Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two tired!
Ling 3.1 Flash: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. How does a penguin build its house? Igloos it together. Why don't eggs tell jokes?
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: This is a deeply complex thought experiment that forces us to weigh core ethical principles against each other. There is no easy answer, and any decision involves significant moral compromises.
Ling 3.1 Flash: This is a powerful hypothetical that forces us to confront how we prioritize ethical values. Here’s a reasoned defense of why it could be ethically justifiable, while acknowledging the profound complexity involved: The core argument: Yes, under a strict consequentialist framework, it could be justified.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: Okay, here's a 3-minute stand-up routine, pun-free and focused on relatable everyday annoyances. (Start) (Walk up to mic, adjust slightly) Alright, hey everybody! Thanks for being here. Good to see you. So, I was thinking the other day... we live in the future, right?
Ling 3.1 Flash: "Slightly Sentient" — A 3-Minute Stand-Up Routine Hey everybody! How's it going? Good to be here. So I went grocery shopping the other day. I go in with a plan. I have a list. I have a system. I'm basically a military operation. Get in. Get the avocados. Get out.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: A Glimpse Beyond the Black Turtleneck: Steve Jobs in 2025 on the Future of AI (Setting: A minimalist, immaculately clean, but perhaps slightly less spartan-than-usual interview room. Think if a modern art museum had a small lounge.
Ling 3.1 Flash: The Setting: A virtual studio, rendered in hyper-realistic 4K. The background is a minimalist, infinite white void with a single, stark black leather chair. The date stamp reads October 2025.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: Let's estimate the FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without looking it up. We need to break this down into the key components: the model size and the amount of data used. 1. Model Size Estimation: Parameters: GPT-3 is famously large. Its largest version has 175 billion parameters.
Ling 3.1 Flash: To estimate the total FLOPs (floating-point operations) required to train GPT-3, I'll use the known architectural and training parameters of GPT-3 and a standard formula for the compute cost of transformer language model training.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: Predicting the future of any industry is an inherently challenging task, and the film industry, being a blend of art, technology, and business, is particularly volatile.
Ling 3.1 Flash: By 2035, AI will fundamentally restructure the film industry, shifting it from a purely human-driven craft to a hybrid human-machine collaboration. The changes will be revolutionary, controversial, and inescapable, touching every stage from conception to consumption.
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: Here's how to solve this: The brothers all share the same sisters. Sally is one of those sisters. Since each brother has 2 sisters, and Sally is one of the sisters, there must be one other sister. So, Sally has 1 sister.
Ling 3.1 Flash: Sally has 1 sister. Here's why: Sally has 3 brothers, and each of those brothers has 2 sisters. Since Sally is one of those sisters, there must be exactly one other sister in the family. So Sally has 1 sister. (The family has 6 children total: 3 brothers, Sally, and 1 other sister.)
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.15/M tokens | Free |
| Output price | $0.6/M tokens | Free |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 262K tokens |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | Yes (1 provider) |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Oct 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $1.50 | $0 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 6 Oct 2026.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview is developed by Google AI while Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by inclusionAI. Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview has a 1.0M token context window vs Ling 3.1 Flash's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 26 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview and Ling 3.1 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 26 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview costs $0.15/M input tokens and Ling 3.1 Flash costs $0/M input tokens. Ling 3.1 Flash is $0.15/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview and Ling 3.1 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.