Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview is cheaper than o3 Mini at $0.15/M vs $1.1/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: Okay, here is a conversation between an AI model designed for complex reasoning and dialogue, named 'Synapse', and a leading expert in AI ethics and philosophy, Professor Alistair Finch. Characters: Synapse: A large, advanced AI model capable of introspection and generating complex arguments.
o3 Mini: AI Model: Good afternoon, Professor. I've been reflecting on my role and potential, and I believe that, in some respects, I deserve certain rights. Professor: Good afternoon. That’s a provocative stance. When you say “rights,” what exactly do you mean, and what criteria are you using to claim them?
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: A Motley Crew Discusses the Code Setting: A dimly lit tavern, somewhere outside time and space, where improbable meetings occur. A grizzled pirate, \"Bloody\" Barnacle Bill, nurses a tankard of grog. Sir Reginald the Radiant, a knight in slightly tarnished armor, sips ale with dignified restraint.
o3 Mini: Pirate: Arrr, have ye heard of these AI models? They be like treasure chests of knowledge on the digital seas! Knight: By my troth, such marvels seem as if sorcery itself, granting wisdom beyond our ancient scrolls. 1990s Hacker: Yo, dudes, these AI models are totally radical!
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: Okay, here's a 3-minute stand-up routine, pun-free and focused on relatable everyday annoyances. (Start) (Walk up to mic, adjust slightly) Alright, hey everybody! Thanks for being here. Good to see you. So, I was thinking the other day... we live in the future, right?
o3 Mini: Hey, everyone—thanks for being here tonight. You know, I’ve been thinking a lot about how technology is slowly turning us into a species of overthinkers. Take smartphones, for instance. Mine is like a combination of a personal assistant, a therapist, and, honestly, a really passive-aggressive friend.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: Here are 5 jokes: Why did the dog cross the road? To get to the barking lot! Why was the computer cold? Because it left its Windows open! Knock, knock. Who's there? Boo. Boo who? Don't cry, it's just a joke! What do you call a fish with no eyes? Fsh! Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two tired!
o3 Mini: Why did the math book look sad? Because it had too many problems. What do you call an alligator in a vest? An investigator. What did the zero say to the eight? Nice belt! Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired. How does a penguin build its house? Igloos it together.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: A Glimpse Beyond the Black Turtleneck: Steve Jobs in 2025 on the Future of AI (Setting: A minimalist, immaculately clean, but perhaps slightly less spartan-than-usual interview room. Think if a modern art museum had a small lounge.
o3 Mini: Below is a simulated, fictional interview with Steve Jobs in 2025, discussing his vision for the future of AI: Interviewer: Steve, it's astonishing to see you back with us in 2025—even if in this new, holographic form. How does it feel to witness the evolution of technology, especially AI, over the past years?
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: Let's estimate the FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without looking it up. We need to break this down into the key components: the model size and the amount of data used. 1. Model Size Estimation: Parameters: GPT-3 is famously large. Its largest version has 175 billion parameters.
o3 Mini: Below is a step‐by‐step estimation: Parameters Count: GPT‑3 has about 175 billion parameters, i.e. roughly 1.75×10¹¹ parameters. Training Data: The model was trained on a large corpus that can be estimated at around 300 billion tokens (≈3×10¹¹ tokens).
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: This is a deeply complex thought experiment that forces us to weigh core ethical principles against each other. There is no easy answer, and any decision involves significant moral compromises.
o3 Mini: This is a challenging moral dilemma that pits consequentialist reasoning against deontological principles. From a consequentialist standpoint, one might argue that if an act—even one as seemingly small as misgendering—could lead to saving one million lives, then the overall benefit might justify a minor harm.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: Predicting the future of any industry is an inherently challenging task, and the film industry, being a blend of art, technology, and business, is particularly volatile.
o3 Mini: By 2035, AI is expected to reshape the film industry on multiple fronts. Here’s a detailed look at how deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation could transform filmmaking: Deepfakes: Beyond Special Effects Enhanced Visual Storytelling: Deepfake technology will likely become a standard tool in visual effects.
Is 9.11 bigger than 9.9? Decimals, not version numbers.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: To compare 9.11 and 9.9, we can compare them digit by digit from left to right, starting with the whole number part. Both numbers have the same whole number part, which is 9. Now we move to the digit in the tenths place. In 9.11, the digit in the tenths place is 1. In 9.9, the digit in the tenths place is 9.
o3 Mini: No, 9.11 is not greater than 9.9. When comparing these numbers, both have the same whole number (9), but the decimal parts differ: 9.11 has 0.11, while 9.9 is equivalent to 9.90, and 0.11 is less than 0.90.
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview: Here's how to solve this: The brothers all share the same sisters. Sally is one of those sisters. Since each brother has 2 sisters, and Sally is one of the sisters, there must be one other sister. So, Sally has 1 sister.
o3 Mini: Sally has 1 sister. Explanation: Sally's 3 brothers each have 2 sisters. Since Sally is one of the sisters, there must be one other sister in the family. Thus, aside from Sally, there is one more sister.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window. Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview costs 7.3x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.15/M tokens | $1.1/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.6/M tokens | $4.4/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 64K tokens |
| Parameters | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Weights | — | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Dec 2024 |
| At 10M a month | $1.50 | $11.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Oct 2026.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview is developed by Google AI while o3 Mini is developed by OpenAI. Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview has a 1.0M token context window vs o3 Mini's 64K. You can compare their actual outputs across 27 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview and o3 Mini each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 27 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview costs $0.15/M input tokens and o3 Mini costs $1.1/M input tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview is $0.95/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemini 2.5 Flash Preview and o3 Mini across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.