Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs OpenAI o4 Mini High
Compare Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental by Google AI against OpenAI o4 Mini High by OpenAI, in 53 community votes, gemini 2.5 pro experimental wins 64% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 1.0M vs 200K, tested across 43 shared challenges.
Web Design: Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental wins 67% of votes
Image Generation: Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental wins 69% of votes
Conversation: Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental wins 67% of votes
Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Pro ExperimentalWinner
OpenAI o4 Mini HighRunner-up
Pick Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental. In 53 blind votes, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental wins 64% of the time. That's not luck.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental particularly excels in Image Generation, Web Design, Conversation.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Input
$1.00
1.1× cheaper
Output
$2.00
2.2× cheaper
OpenAI o4 Mini High
Input
$1.10
Output
$4.40
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is cheaper on both — 1.1× input, 2.2× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
49%
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental uses 557.3x more bold
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
OpenAI o4 Mini High
54%Vocabulary70%
15wSentence Length18w
0.35Hedging0.33
5.6Bold0.0
3.9Lists1.3
0.00Emoji0.02
0.39Headings0.00
0.17Transitions0.04
Based on 18 + 14 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
