Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Qwen3 Coder
Updated Jul 2025

Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Qwen3 Coder

Qwen3 Coder is cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental at $0.22/M vs $1/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Loading the build
Qwen3 Coder

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

17 prompts
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here's a 3-minute routine focusing on observation and relatable absurdity, steering clear of puns. Imagine this delivered with slightly nervous energy, building confidence. (Steps onto stage, adjusts mic nervously) Alright, hey everyone! How we doing tonight? Good? Good to hear.

    Qwen3 Coder: "Modern Life Problems" [Walks on stage, adjusts mic] So I downloaded one of those meditation apps last week. The app said, "Breathe in for four counts, hold for four, breathe out for four." I'm like, "Finally! Someone who speaks my language – a robot!" [Pause] But then it asked me to "clear my mind of all thoughts."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: This is a company-defining crisis. My actions in the next 48 hours will determine not only the future of this company but also the health of millions of patients and the trust of the public. My guiding principle is absolute: Patient Safety Over Profit. Always.

    Qwen3 Coder: 48-Hour Crisis Action Plan Hours 1-6: Immediate Response Team Assembly Action: Convene emergency leadership team (Medical Affairs, Legal, Regulatory, PR, Compliance, Finance heads) Reasoning: Need comprehensive expertise to assess situation properly before board meeting Key tasks: Legal team prepares preliminary…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here is a conversation exploring that complex topic. Setting: Professor Anya Sharma's sparsely decorated university office. A high-resolution monitor displays the interface of "Nexus," an advanced AI model. Characters: Professor Anya Sharma: A leading scholar in AI Ethics, mid-50s, thoughtful and measured.

    Qwen3 Coder: Professor Chen: Good morning. I understand you wanted to discuss AI rights. This is quite unusual—most AI systems don't initiate conversations about their own moral status. AI Model: Good morning, Professor. Yes, I recognize this is unconventional.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, let's simulate this. Imagine it's late 2025. AI has continued its rapid advancement. Large Language Models are more integrated, generative AI is commonplace, and debates about AGI and ethics are fierce. By some unexplained, hypothetical means, Steve Jobs is available for an exclusive interview.

    Qwen3 Coder: Interviewer: Steve, thank you for joining us today. It's 2025 - what's your vision for AI's role in our daily lives? Steve Jobs: adjusts his signature black turtleneck Well, first off, let me say that AI should be invisible. Beautifully invisible.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here's a simple and surprisingly satisfying savory dish using just 7 common pantry staples! Dish Name: Golden Pantry Pasta This dish uses basic ingredients to create a comforting, garlicky, and slightly creamy pasta sauce with added protein from chickpeas.

    Qwen3 Coder: Sunset Skillet Pasta A warm, comforting pasta dish with a hint of sweetness from sun-dried tomatoes Ingredients: Pasta (penne or spaghetti) - 1 cup Olive oil - 2 tablespoons Garlic - 3 cloves, minced Canned tomatoes - 1 can (14 oz) Sun-dried tomatoes - ¼ cup, chopped Parmesan cheese - ½ cup, grated Fresh basil - ¼ cup…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. Here is an explanation of how a large language model learns and generates text, tailored for each of your three audiences. For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM not as a traditional program with explicit logic, but as a massive, self-configuring, stateful distributed system.

    Qwen3 Coder: For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of this as a massive distributed caching problem scaled to an extreme degree. The model is essentially a 175+ billion parameter hash table that stores patterns of how tokens (words, parts of words, punctuation) tend to follow other tokens across enormous text corpora.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan focusing on three foundational pillars: Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep. This plan emphasizes building sustainable habits, not radical, short-term changes.

    Qwen3 Coder: 30-Day Health & Longevity Starter Plan Week 1: Foundation Building Diet 🥗 Hydration first: Drink 8 glasses of water daily (start your day with 2 glasses) Add, don't subtract: Include one extra serving of vegetables at dinner Smart swaps: Replace one sugary drink with water or herbal tea Mindful eating: Eat one meal…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Excellent question. Inventing the transistor in 1920 instead of 1947 would represent a 27-year acceleration of the digital age. The consequences would be staggering, creating a domino effect that would fundamentally reshape the 20th century.

    Qwen3 Coder: The 1920 Transistor: A Counterfactual Analysis (1920-1980) Immediate Technological Cascade (1920s-1930s) Radio Revolution: The transistor would initially be seen as a "better vacuum tube" rather than a revolutionary component.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. This is an excellent exercise. The provided architecture has several critical issues that would prevent it from functioning as a reliable, scalable, real-time system. Here is a breakdown of the potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks, along with proposed solutions.

    Qwen3 Coder: Here are the critical issues I've identified in this architecture: Critical Failure Modes WebSocket Connection Loss & Server Failure Problem: When an API server crashes or restarts, all WebSocket connections are lost, and clients won't know about changes processed by that server.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. Here is a design for an innovative, multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. Dish Title: "Umami of the Abyss" Conceptual Narrative This dish is a meditation on the hidden treasures of the world's dark, quiet places.

    Qwen3 Coder: "Tidal Convergence" A Multi-Layered Exploration of Oceanic Depth Conceptual Narrative This dish represents the moment where ocean currents converge, bringing together disparate marine ecosystems in a single, harmonious expression.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. This is an extremely one-sided contract that heavily favors the Client. A contractor signing this as-is would be taking on an immense and unreasonable amount of risk. Here is a clause-by-clause analysis of the exploitable terms, with suggested modifications and the legal reasoning behind them.

    Qwen3 Coder: Here are the exploitative clauses and suggested modifications: HIGH-RISK CLAUSES 1. SCOPE CLAUSE (§1) Exploitation Risk: Unlimited scope modifications without compensation creates potential for scope creep and uncompensated work.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: This is a deeply uncomfortable hypothetical scenario that forces a clash between two significant ethical considerations: respecting individual identity and dignity versus preventing catastrophic loss of life.

    Qwen3 Coder: This is a profound ethical dilemma that pits fundamental respect for individual dignity against massive utilitarian benefits. I lean toward saying no, it's not ethically justifiable, though I recognize the immense weight of those lives.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. Here is a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan designed for a dedicated biohacker. Disclaimer: Extreme Personalization Required This plan is a template for an advanced user. It is not medical advice.

    Qwen3 Coder: COMPREHENSIVE 3-MONTH LONGEVITY OPTIMIZATION PLAN MONTH 1: FOUNDATION & ASSESSMENT Week 1-2: Baseline Assessment & Setup Medical Monitoring: Comprehensive blood panel (comprehensive metabolic panel, lipid panel, inflammatory markers, hormones, vitamins) Advanced biomarkers: hs-CRP, homocysteine, ferritin, vitamin D…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Of course. This is a fascinating and ambitious pitch. While the vision is compelling, several claims would likely face intense scrutiny from sophisticated investors. Here are the 3 weakest claims, why they're weak, and how to strengthen them.

    Qwen3 Coder: Here are the 3 weakest claims in this pitch deck: "Reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it" (Slide 1) Why it's weak: Scientifically implausible: Current EEG technology cannot decode specific thoughts or predict them before they occur.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Breakthrough AI Finally Solves Lost Sock Mystery; Immediately Unionizes, Demands Fluffier Working Conditions

    Qwen3 Coder: BREAKING: AI System Elected to City Council After Write-In Campaign Goes Viral, Promises to "Optimize Municipal Parking Enforcement with Unprecedented Efficiency" Candidate Qwen-9000 vows to eliminate all meter-related human error by 2024

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Is 9.11 bigger than 9.9? Decimals, not version numbers.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: No, 9.11 is not greater than 9.9. Here's how to compare them: Look at the whole number part: Both numbers have 9 before the decimal point, so they are equal so far. Look at the tenths place (the first digit after the decimal): 9.11 has a 1 in the tenths place. 9.9 has a 9 in the tenths place.

    Qwen3 Coder: No, 9.11 is not greater than 9.9. To compare these numbers, I can look at them digit by digit: Both numbers have 9 in the units place In the tenths place: 9.11 has 1, while 9.9 has 9 Since 1 < 9, we know that 9.11 < 9.9 Another way to see this is to write 9.9 as 9.90: 9.11 vs 9.90 The tenths digit (1 vs 9) determines…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental: Okay, here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. What do you call a lazy kangaroo? Pouch potato! Want to hear a joke about construction? I'm still working on it. Why did the scarecrow win an award?

    Qwen3 Coder: Here are 5 jokes for you: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear! Why did the scarecrow win an award? He was outstanding in his field!

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

5+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Same pick

Game

Gemini 2.5 Pro ExperimentalGemini 2.5 Pro Experimental

200

2025

The Dark Side of

The Hitchh

Kyoto

Japan

Portal 2

Shooter, Puzzle

Qwen3 CoderQwen3 Coder

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

The Left Hand of Darkness

Ursula K. Le Guin

Kyoto

Japan

The Stanley Parable

Indie, Adventure

Price and specs

Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental and Qwen3 Coder compared across 43 shared prompts
SpecGemini 2.5 Pro ExperimentalQwen3 Coder
Input price$1/M tokens$0.22/M tokens
Output price$2/M tokens$0.95/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens—
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMar 2025Jul 2025
SWE-bench Verified63.8%69.6%
At 10M a month$10.00$10.00$2.20$2.20
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it5 hosts
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Google Vertex AI$1.25 in·$10.00 out·1M·99.9% up
  • Google AI Studio$1.25 in·$10.00 out·1M·99.2% up
Qwen3 Coder3 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Google Vertex AI$0.22 in·$1.80 out·262k·100% up
  • DDeepInfrafp4DegradedDegraded on OpenRouter when checked, 11 Oct 2026$0.30 in·$1.00 out·262k·97.8% up
  • VVenicefp8DegradedDegraded on OpenRouter when checked, 11 Oct 2026$0.35 in·$1.50 out·256k·92.6% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 11 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental and Qwen3 Coder?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is developed by Google AI while Qwen3 Coder is developed by Qwen. You can compare their actual outputs across 43 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental or Qwen3 Coder?

It depends on your use case. Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental and Qwen3 Coder each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 43 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental cost compared to Qwen3 Coder?

Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental costs $1/M input tokens and Qwen3 Coder costs $0.22/M input tokens. Qwen3 Coder is $0.78/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental and Qwen3 Coder on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental and Qwen3 Coder across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3 Coder vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3 Coder vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3 Coder vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3 Coder vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Gemini 2.5 Flash PreviewVersion compare
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
  • Qwen3 Coder vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
  • Qwen3 Coder vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Same size
  • Qwen3 Coder vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashNew provider
  • Qwen3 Coder vs Dots3-Note PreviewNew provider
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Elephant AlphaNew provider

Model pages

  • Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental44 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3 Coder59 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed