Gemini 2.5 Pro ExperimentalvsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental at $0.15/M vs $1/M input tokens.
| Spec | Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1/M tokens | $0.15/M tokens |
| Output price | $2/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 66K tokens |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Sep 2025 |
Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Input
$1.00
Output
$2.00
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input
$0.15
6.7× cheaper
Output
$1.50
1.3× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper on both — 6.7× input, 1.3× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
45%
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 57.7x more emoji
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
54%Vocabulary54%
15wSentence Length16w
0.35Hedging0.31
5.6Bold6.0
3.9Lists4.5
0.00Emoji0.58
0.39Headings0.88
0.17Transitions0.10
Based on 18 + 17 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT-5New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Bert-Nebulon AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs ChatGPT-4o (March 2025)New provider
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental vs Claude 2New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Claude 3 HaikuNew provider