Llama 4 MaverickvsQwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper than Llama 4 Maverick at $0.15/M vs $1.5/M input tokens.
| Spec | Llama 4 Maverick | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.5/M tokens | $0.15/M tokens |
| Output price | $2.5/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 66K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Sep 2025 |
Our Verdict
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Llama 4 Maverick has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Llama 4 Maverick
Input
$1.50
Output
$2.50
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input
$0.15
10× cheaper
Output
$1.50
1.7× cheaper
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper on both: 10× input, 1.7× output.
Where to run it
7 hosts, cheapest first
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking2 hosts
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
30%
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking uses 92.0x more emoji
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
49%Vocabulary56%
20wSentence Length16w
0.63Hedging0.32
2.8Bold5.1
3.8Lists3.9
0.00Emoji0.92
0.65Headings0.75
0.09Transitions0.08
Based on 26 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs GPT-5New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Gemini Pro 1.0New provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Gemma 3 12BNew provider
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Gemma 3 27BNew provider
Llama 4 Maverick vs Gemma 3n 2BNew provider