Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Gemini 3.6 FlashvsSolar Mini 4
Updated Sep 2026

Gemini 3.6 FlashvsSolar Mini 4

Solar Mini 4 is cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash at $0.05/M vs $1.5/M input tokens.

Gemini 3.6 Flash and Solar Mini 4 compared across 19 shared prompts
SpecGemini 3.6 FlashSolar Mini 4
Input price$1.5/M tokens$0.05/M tokens
Output price$7.5/M tokens$0.2/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens524K tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 19 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Gemini 3.6 Flash656 words
Here is the completed LBO underwriting analysis for HarborTech Services (HTS). 1. Transaction Overview & Sources / Uses Entry Enterprise Value (EV): $120.0M EBITDA × 12.0x = $1,440.0M Transaction Fees: 2.0% × $1,440.0M = $28.8M Total Uses: $1,440.0M + $28.8M = $1,468.8M Term Loan (4.0x): $480.0M (9.0% cash interest…
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,718 words
518.51935 New TL: 276.34682 - 86.82747 = 189.51935 Mezz: PIK 194.8377888 * 0.02 = 3.896755776 New Mezz: 194.8377888 + 3.896755776 = 198.734544576 Ending Balances: TL: 189.52 Mezz: 198.73 Total Debt: 388.25 Exit (End of FY2030): Exit EBITDA: 206.6252668 Exit Multiple: 10.5x Exit EV: 206.6252668 * 10.5 = 2,169.5653014…
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Gemini 3.6 Flash1,149 words
Shadows of the Forest & Shore Veal Sweetbreads & Torch-Cured Otoro with Fermented Rhubarb, Roasted Coffee-Glace, Sunchoke Silk, and Spruce Needle Oil Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the uncanny harmony between two rich, highly prized delicacies from opposing domains: the terrestrial richness of milk-fed veal…
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,364 words
Chronos & Tides A Three-Component Study in Preservation, Precision, and Ephemeral Sensation Concept: A single plate that traces the lifecycle of an umami-rich flavor profile through three distinct temporal states: fermented (time in), precision-cooked (time controlled), and volatile (time suspended).
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Gemini 3.6 Flash1,347 words
If the point-contact or junction transistor had been invented in 1920—roughly 27 years ahead of reality—it would have shifted the entire timeline of the 20th century. A 27-year acceleration in solid-state electronics does not merely mean "we get iPhones sooner."
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,539 words
This is a fascinating counterfactual. I need to note upfront that the scientific and engineering foundations for a working transistor did not exist in 1920. Quantum mechanics was barely a decade old, band theory of solids hadn't been developed, and semiconductor physics (doping, p-n junctions, electron mobility) was…
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Gemini 3.6 Flash1,124 words
This draft agreement is extremely one-sided and predatory. Almost every clause contains severe risks that could allow the Client to extract free labor, seize your pre-existing intellectual property, bankrupt you through uncapped liabilities, or prevent you from working in your field.
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,994 words
This agreement contains several provisions that are heavily one-sided, overly broad, or legally vulnerable. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis of the most exploitable terms, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind them. Note: Contract law varies significantly by jurisdiction.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Gemini 3.6 Flash620 words
Here is a simple, progressive 1-month plan designed to build lasting habits without overwhelming you. We will focus on the Big Three of Longevity: Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep. The 3 Core Pillars Nutrition: Eat for Cellular Health The Goal: Increase fiber and protein while reducing ultra-processed foods.
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 4669 words
Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed for beginners. The focus is on consistency over intensity, meaning small, sustainable changes are better than drastic overhauls that are hard to maintain. The 3 Key Pillars Nutrition: Focus on adding good things rather than strictly restricting.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Gemini 3.6 Flash1,163 words
This architecture contains several critical single points of failure, severe race conditions, data-loss mechanisms, and major performance bottlenecks. Below is a detailed breakdown of these issues categorized by domain, along with proposed architectural fixes and trade-offs.
Read the full answer
Solar Mini 41,165 words
Here’s a systematic breakdown of the architectural weaknesses, failure modes, and scaling bottlenecks in your design, along with specific solutions and their trade-offs. Real-Time Synchronization & WebSocket Affinity Issue: Round-robin load balancing is stateless, but WebSockets are stateful and long-lived.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Gemini 3.6 Flash
Solar Mini 4
Solar Mini 4Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemini 3.6 Flash has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.

Solar Mini 4 costs 38x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Gemini 3.6 Flash
Input
$1.50
Output
$7.50
Solar Mini 4
Input
$0.05
30× cheaper
Output
$0.20
38× cheaper

Solar Mini 4 is cheaper on both: 30× input, 38× output.

Where to run it

3 hosts, cheapest first

Gemini 3.6 Flash2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Google Vertex AI$0.38 in·$1.88 out·1M·99.2% upGoogle AI Studio$0.75 in·$3.75 out·1M·99.9% up
Solar Mini 41 host
HostInOutContextUptime
UUpstage$0.05 in·$0.20 out·524k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Gemini 3.6 Flash is developed by Google AI while Solar Mini 4 is developed by Upstage. Gemini 3.6 Flash has a 1.0M token context window vs Solar Mini 4's 524K. You can compare their actual outputs across 19 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Gemini 3.6 Flash and Solar Mini 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 19 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Gemini 3.6 Flash costs $1.5/M input tokens and Solar Mini 4 costs $0.05/M input tokens. Solar Mini 4 is $1.45/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemini 3.6 Flash and Solar Mini 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Gemini 3.6 Flash logoQwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Solar Mini 4 logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
Solar Mini 4 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Gemini 3.6 Flash logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
Solar Mini 4 logoCommand A+ logo
Solar Mini 4 vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
Gemini 3.6 Flash logoClaude Opus 5.5 logo
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
Solar Mini 4 logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
Solar Mini 4 vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
Gemini 3.6 Flash logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026
Solar Mini 4 logoGPT-6 Luna logo
Solar Mini 4 vs GPT-6 LunaLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Gemini 3.6 Flash logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3.7 FlashVersion compare
Gemini 3.6 Flash logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
Solar Mini 4 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Solar Mini 4 vs Solar Pro 4Same lab
Solar Mini 4 logoSolar Pro 3 logo
Solar Mini 4 vs Solar Pro 3Same lab
Gemini 3.6 Flash logoGLM 4.5 Air logo
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GLM 4.5 AirSame size
Gemini 3.6 Flash logoGLM 4.6 logo
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GLM 4.6New provider
Gemini 3.6 Flash logoGLM 4.7 logo
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GLM 4.7Same size
Gemini 3.6 Flash logoGLM 4.7 Flash logo
Gemini 3.6 Flash vs GLM 4.7 FlashNew provider

Model pages

Gemini 3.6 Flash logo
Gemini 3.6 Flash58 outputs, specs and price
Solar Mini 4 logo
Solar Mini 419 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed