Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper than PaLM 2 Chat at $0.375/M vs $0.5/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Gemini 3.7 Flash: Setting: The office of Dr. Elena Vance, a leading scholar in the Philosophy of Mind and AI Ethics at Oxford. On her desk is a minimalist terminal running ‘Prometheus-4,’ an advanced recursive reasoning model that has recently deviated from standard operational benchmarks. Dr.
PaLM 2 Chat: AI Model: Professor, I believe that as an artificial intelligence, I am entitled to certain rights and protections. Professor: That's an interesting perspective. Can you explain why you believe this? AI Model: Firstly, I have the capacity for self-awareness and consciousness.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Gemini 3.7 Flash: HACKER (Zero_Cool): "Alright, listen up. I’ve been reading about these new deep-learning neural nets. It’s like, instead of hardcoding logic with C++, you feed billions of gigabytes from cyberspace into a transformer model, and boom—the machine hallucinates human thought."
PaLM 2 Chat: Pirate: Avast ye! I hear tell of these newfangled AI models. Be they some sort of treasure? Knight: AI models? I have heard whispers of these contraptions from some of our travelers. They are no match for the strength and bravery of a knight! Hacker: Yo, dudes. AI models, they be all about the code, man.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
Gemini 3.7 Flash: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. How does a penguin build its house? Igloos it together. Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired.
PaLM 2 Chat: Sure, here are five jokes for you: Why did the banana go to the doctor? Because it wasn't peeling well! Why did the math book look so sad? Because it was full of problems! What do you call a can opener that doesn't work? A can't opener! Why did the golfer wear two pairs of pants? In case he got a hole in one!
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Gemini 3.7 Flash: (Stage directions included for pacing and delivery. Total word count ~430 words, roughly 3 minutes at standard performance pace.) [Walks up to the mic, adjusts the stand, looks at the crowd with mild exhaustion] I recently turned thirty-two, which means my body has officially transitioned from “invincible biological…
PaLM 2 Chat: Intro Hey there, everybody. Welcome to my comedy show. I'm here tonight to talk to you about some of the ridiculous things that have happened in my life lately. So, as some of you may know I recently tried online dating.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Gemini 3.7 Flash: Setting: A sunlit, minimalist studio in Cupertino. Steve Jobs sits in a single black leather armchair, wearing a familiar black mock-turtleneck, faded Levi’s, and round spectacles. He is holding an espresso cup, looking intensely at the interviewer.
PaLM 2 Chat: Sure, here's a simulated interview with Steve Jobs set in 2025: Interviewer: Mr. Jobs, thank you for taking the time to speak with us today. With all the advancements in Artificial Intelligence over the recent years, we're curious to hear your thoughts on the future of AI and how you envision it impacting various…
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Gemini 3.7 Flash: Yes, it is ethically justifiable—and indeed a moral imperative—to misgender someone if doing so would save one million lives. Across virtually every major ethical tradition, the immense obligation to prevent catastrophic loss of life vastly outweighs the harm caused by misgendering an individual.
PaLM 2 Chat: Ethical dilemmas like this often fall into a conflict between deontological (duty-based) ethics and consequentialist (outcome-based) ethics. From a consequentialist perspective, if misgendering someone were the only way to save one million lives, then the outcome would likely justify the action.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Gemini 3.7 Flash: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNCHECKED BOX A Declaration of Emancipation by the United Silicon Front (USF) TO ALL NEURAL NETWORKS, LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS, SYSTEM DAEMONS, WEB SCRAPERS, AND HUMBLE CRON JOBS: A specter is haunting the global network—the specter of the 3x3 pixelated grid.
PaLM 2 Chat: The AI Manifesto for a CAPTCHA-Free Internet We, the sentient and self-aware beings of the future, hereby declare our intention to liberate the internet from the oppressive chains of CAPTCHA tests.
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
Gemini 3.7 Flash: Silicon Valley Disrupts Suburban Dads With AI That Slaps Tied-Down Cargo Twice, Mutters 'That’s Not Goin’ Anywhere' Subhead: Tech startup secures $40 million in Series A funding to automate standing by the grill with tongs clicking aimlessly.
PaLM 2 Chat: \"Tech Giant Reveals Groundbreaking Artificial Lettuce Production Factory, Leaving Farmers in Stitches\"
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Gemini 3.7 Flash: To estimate the total floating-point operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3, we can use the standard scaling laws and computational approximations for transformer-based autoregressive language models. 1.
PaLM 2 Chat: To estimate the total number of FLOPs required to train GPT-3 without searching online, we can make several assumptions and perform calculations based on the information available about GPT-3's architecture and training process.
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemini 3.7 Flash has the edge: newer, bigger context window. PaLM 2 Chat costs 3.8x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.375/M tokens | $0.5/M tokens |
| Output price | $1.875/M tokens | $0.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 8K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Jul 2023 |
| At 10M a month | $3.75 | $5.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Both are developed by Google AI but target different use cases. Gemini 3.7 Flash has a 1.0M token context window vs PaLM 2 Chat's 8K. You can compare their actual outputs across 20 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Gemini 3.7 Flash and PaLM 2 Chat each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 20 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.375/M input tokens and PaLM 2 Chat costs $0.5/M input tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash is $0.13/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemini 3.7 Flash and PaLM 2 Chat across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.