Gemini 3.8 FlashvsQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Gemini 3.8 Flash at $0.071/M vs $0.75/M input tokens.
| Spec | Gemini 3.8 Flash | Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.75/M tokens | $0.071/M tokens |
| Output price | $3.75/M tokens | $0.285/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 262K tokens |
| Released | Sep 2026 | Aug 2025 |
Our Verdict
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemini 3.8 Flash has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs 13x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input
$0.75
Output
$3.75
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
11× cheaper
Output
$0.28
13× cheaper
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 11× input, 13× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
56%
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 89.3x more emoji
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
63%Vocabulary52%
20wSentence Length15w
0.17Hedging0.20
4.0Bold7.0
2.4Lists4.2
0.01Emoji0.89
0.84Headings0.91
0.06Transitions0.10
Based on 27 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Muse Spark 1.3New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5.1New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5.1 ChatNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5.1-CodexNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5.1 Codex MaxNew provider