GPT-5.1-CodexvsQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than GPT-5.1-Codex at $0.071/M vs $1.25/M input tokens.
| Spec | GPT-5.1-Codex | Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.25/M tokens | $0.071/M tokens |
| Output price | $10/M tokens | $0.285/M tokens |
| Context window | 400K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Nov 2025 | Aug 2025 |
Our Verdict
GPT-5.1-Codex
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.1-Codex has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs 35x less per token.
Slight edge
Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GPT-5.1-Codex
Input
$1.25
Output
$10.00
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
18× cheaper
Output
$0.28
35× cheaper
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both: 18× input, 35× output.
Where to run it
2 hosts
GPT-5.1-Codex1 host
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 25071 host
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 11 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
29%
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 89.3x more emoji
GPT-5.1-Codex
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
70%Vocabulary52%
17wSentence Length15w
0.39Hedging0.20
3.4Bold7.0
3.5Lists4.2
0.00Emoji0.89
0.50Headings0.91
0.38Transitions0.10
Based on 14 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
GPT-5.1-Codex vs Qwen3.5 FlashCross-provider
GPT-5.1-Codex vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Cross-provider
GPT-5.1-Codex vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Cross-provider
GPT-5.1-Codex vs Qwen3.6 27BCross-provider