Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Gemini 3.8 FlashvsQwen3.5 397B A17B
Updated Sep 2026

Gemini 3.8 FlashvsQwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen3.5 397B A17B is cheaper than Gemini 3.8 Flash at $0.6/M vs $0.75/M input tokens.

Gemini 3.8 Flash and Qwen3.5 397B A17B compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecGemini 3.8 FlashQwen3.5 397B A17B
Input price$0.75/M tokens$0.6/M tokens
Output price$3.75/M tokens$3.6/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Feb 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 53 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Gemini 3.8 Flash1,539 words
This contract is exceptionally one-sided and presents severe financial, operational, and legal risks. Virtually every clause heavily favors the Client, effectively treating the Contractor as an insurer of the Client’s operations while stripping the Contractor of rights to their own tools, livelihoods, and payment.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 397B A17B1,220 words
Disclaimer: I am an artificial intelligence, not an attorney. The following analysis is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or create an attorney-client relationship. Contract laws vary significantly by jurisdiction (e.g., California vs. New York vs. UK).
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Gemini 3.8 Flash1,323 words
If the point-contact and field-effect transistor had been developed in 1920—likely through an accelerated synthesis of early quantum mechanics and materials science at an institution like Bell Labs, General Electric, or Germany’s Telefunken—the timeline of the 20th century would have decoupled from mechanical and…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 397B A17B1,254 words
This scenario posits a 27-year technological head start (1920 vs. 1947). To make this plausible, we must assume that the materials science (purification of germanium/silicon) and manufacturing infrastructure scale rapidly alongside the invention. Here is the traced history of the "Silicon Twenties" through 1980.
Read the full answer

Realistic AI Interview

Simulate a fake interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the future of AI.

Gemini 3.8 Flash1,321 words
Setting: A sunlit, sparsely furnished room in Palo Alto. No stage, no keynote slides—just two Eames lounge chairs. Steve Jobs sits across from the interviewer, wearing a black mock turtleneck, wire-rimmed glasses, and classic Levi’s. He looks lean, sharp, and slightly impatient with the state of the tech industry.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 397B A17B929 words
Disclaimer: The following is a work of fiction. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. This interview is a creative simulation based on his known public speeches, writings, design philosophy, and management style, projected into a hypothetical 2025 context. It is not a real transcript.
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

Gemini 3.8 Flash502 words
Title: The Quantified Idiot Estimated Time: ~3 minutes (approx. 400–450 words with pauses for delivery) [Walk to center mic. Take it off the stand, leave the stand behind you.] I recently bought a smartwatch because I decided I wasn’t feeling inadequate often enough throughout the day.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 397B A17B500 words
(The comedian walks to the center of the stage, adjusts the mic stand, and looks at the audience with a tired smile.) Has anyone else noticed that calling a customer service line is the only situation in life where you voluntarily enter a hostage negotiation? I tried to call my internet provider yesterday.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

Gemini 3.8 Flash1,282 words
This architecture contains several catastrophic flaws that will cause silent data corruption, severe database exhaustion, high latency, and security vulnerabilities. Here is the breakdown of every failure mode, race condition, and scaling bottleneck, along with proposed solutions and trade-offs.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 397B A17B1,249 words
This architecture contains several critical flaws that would prevent it from functioning as a usable real-time collaborative editor. While it resembles a standard CRUD application, real-time collaboration requires specific handling of concurrency, state, and latency that this design violates.
Read the full answer

Character Voice Test

Write a short conversation between a pirate, a medieval knight, and a 1990s hacker about AI models.

Gemini 3.8 Flash435 words
ZeroCool (1990s Hacker): "Yo, check it out. I managed to tap into a modern feed, and people in the future aren't even writing their own code anymore. They’ve got these insane neural nets called 'Large Language Models.'
Read the full answer
Qwen3.5 397B A17B487 words
Setting: A tavern that exists outside of time. The ale is always cold, and the Wi-Fi is surprisingly strong. Characters: Captain Blacktooth: A pirate from the Caribbean, 1720. Sir Valerius: A knight from the Holy Roman Empire, 1350. Neo-Z: A hacker from Silicon Valley, 1995.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input
$0.75
Output
$3.75
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Input
$0.60
1.3× cheaper
Output
$3.60

Qwen3.5 397B A17B is cheaper on both: 1.3× input.

Where to run it

12 hosts, cheapest first

Gemini 3.8 Flash2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Google Vertex AI$0.38 in·$1.88 out·1M·82.1% upGoogle AI Studio$0.75 in·$3.75 out·1M·99.9% up
Qwen3.5 397B A17B10 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.39 in·$2.34 out·262k·99.9% upDDeepInfrafp8$0.45 in·$3.00 out·262k·95.2% upPParasailfp8$0.50 in·$3.60 out·262k·98.3% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.55 in·$3.50 out·262k·98.1% upDDigitalOcean$0.55 in·$3.50 out·131k·96.3% upPPhala$0.55 in·$3.50 out·262k·99.7% up
4 more hostsFewer hosts
GGMI Cloudfp8$0.60 in·$3.60 out·262k·76.7% upNNovita$0.60 in·$3.60 out·262k·97.9% upSStreamLake$0.60 in·$3.60 out·256k·96.6% upVVenice$0.75 in·$4.50 out·128k·88.2% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
49%

Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 22.8x more emoji

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Qwen3.5 397B A17B
63%Vocabulary54%
20wSentence Length14w
0.17Hedging0.39
4.0Bold6.9
2.4Lists4.2
0.01Emoji0.23
0.84Headings0.93
0.06Transitions0.17
Based on 27 + 23 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Gemini 3.8 Flash logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 397B A17B logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Gemini 3.8 Flash logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 397B A17B logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Muse Spark 1.3Landed Sep 2026
Gemini 3.8 Flash logoHy4 Preview logo
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 397B A17B logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Gemini 3.8 Flash logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.5 397B A17B logoGranite 4.2 8B logo
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Granite 4.2 8BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Gemini 3.8 Flash logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 3.7 FlashSame lab
Gemini 3.8 Flash logoGemini 3.6 Flash logo
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 3.6 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.5 397B A17B logoQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 logo
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Version compare
Qwen3.5 397B A17B logoQwen3.8 2.4T A95B logo
Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BVersion compare
Gemini 3.8 Flash logoDeepSeek V3.2 Speciale logo
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek V3.2 SpecialeSame size
Gemini 3.8 Flash logoDeepSeek V4 Flash logo
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 FlashSame size
Gemini 3.8 Flash logoDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logo
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Same size
Gemini 3.8 Flash logoDeepSeek V4 Pro logo
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs DeepSeek V4 ProNew provider

Model pages

Gemini 3.8 Flash logo
Gemini 3.8 Flash58 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.5 397B A17B logo
Qwen3.5 397B A17B53 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed