Gemma 3 12BvsQwen3 Coder Flash
Gemma 3 12B is cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Flash at $0.03/M vs $0.3/M input tokens.
| Spec | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3 Coder Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.03/M tokens | $0.3/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.03/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | — | 128K tokens |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Sep 2025 |
Our Verdict
Gemma 3 12B
Qwen3 Coder FlashRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemma 3 12B has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing.
Gemma 3 12B costs 50x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemma 3 12B
Input
$0.03
10× cheaper
Output
$0.03
50× cheaper
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Input
$0.30
Output
$1.50
Gemma 3 12B is cheaper on both — 10× input, 50× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
50%
Qwen3 Coder Flash uses 28.1x more headings
Gemma 3 12B
Qwen3 Coder Flash
52%Vocabulary60%
17wSentence Length92w
0.66Hedging0.60
6.2Bold6.1
5.4Lists6.2
0.00Emoji0.00
0.06Headings1.64
0.23Transitions0.18
Based on 23 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Grok 4New provider
Gemma 3 12B vs Ling 2.6 FlashNew provider
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Llama 3 70BNew provider
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Llama 3.1 405BNew provider
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)New provider