Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Compare Gemma 3 27B by Google AI against Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, in 8 community votes, qwen3 30b a3b thinking 2507 wins 60% of head-to-head duels, tested across 55 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Gemma 3 27B or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is the better choice overall, winning 60% of 8 blind community votes on Rival. Gemma 3 27B costs $0.09/M input tokens vs $0.071/M for Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Gemma 3 27B is made by google while Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is from qwen. On pricing, Gemma 3 27B costs $0.09/M input tokens vs $0.071/M for Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507. In community voting, In 8 community votes, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 wins 60% of head-to-head duels.
In 8 community votes, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 wins 60% of head-to-head duels. Gemma 3 27B leads in Reasoning, while Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 leads in Image Generation. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 8+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Pick Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507. In 8 blind votes, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 wins 60% of the time. That's not luck.
Pick Gemma 3 27B for Reasoning. Pick Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 for Image Generation.
Style Comparison
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 67.9x more emoji
vsAsk them anything yourself
Some models write identically. You are paying for the brand.
178 models fingerprinted across 32 writing dimensions. Free research.
185x
price gap between models that write identically
178
models
12
clone pairs
32
dimensions
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.
