Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Gemma 3 27B at $0.071/M vs $0.09/M input tokens.
| Spec | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.09/M tokens | $0.071/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.17/M tokens | $0.285/M tokens |
| Context window | — | 262K tokens |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Aug 2025 |
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemma 3 27B has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing.
Pick Gemma 3 27B for Reasoning. Pick Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 for Image Generation.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 wins input (1.3× cheaper)·Gemma 3 27B wins output (1.7× cheaper)
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 67.9x more emoji
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Gemma 3 27B at $0.071/M vs $0.09/M input tokens.
| Spec | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.09/M tokens | $0.071/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.17/M tokens | $0.285/M tokens |
| Context window | — | 262K tokens |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Aug 2025 |
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemma 3 27B has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing.
Pick Gemma 3 27B for Reasoning. Pick Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 for Image Generation.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 wins input (1.3× cheaper)·Gemma 3 27B wins output (1.7× cheaper)
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 67.9x more emoji