Gemma 3 27BvsQwen3 Coder Flash
Gemma 3 27B is cheaper than Qwen3 Coder Flash at $0.09/M vs $0.3/M input tokens.
| Spec | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3 Coder Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.09/M tokens | $0.3/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.17/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | — | 128K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Sep 2025 |
Our Verdict
Gemma 3 27B
Qwen3 Coder FlashRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemma 3 27B has the edge: bigger model tier, major provider backing.
Gemma 3 27B costs 8.8x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemma 3 27B
Input
$0.09
3.3× cheaper
Output
$0.17
8.8× cheaper
Qwen3 Coder Flash
Input
$0.30
Output
$1.50
Gemma 3 27B is cheaper on both: 3.3× input, 8.8× output.
Where to run it
5 hosts, cheapest first
Qwen3 Coder Flash1 host
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 8 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
48%
Qwen3 Coder Flash uses 8.0x more headings
Gemma 3 27B
Qwen3 Coder Flash
55%Vocabulary60%
15wSentence Length85w
0.44Hedging0.56
5.2Bold5.6
4.1Lists5.8
0.42Emoji0.22
0.19Headings1.49
0.12Transitions0.15
Based on 29 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Qwen3 Coder Flash vs GPT-4.1New provider
Gemma 3 27B vs MiniMax M2New provider
Gemma 3 27B vs MiniMax M2-herNew provider
Gemma 3 27B vs MiniMax M2.1New provider
Gemma 3 27B vs MiniMax M2.5New provider