Gemma 3n 4B vs Llama 4 Maverick
Compare Gemma 3n 4B by Google AI against Llama 4 Maverick by Meta AI, context windows of 33K vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated June 2026.
Which is better, Gemma 3n 4B or Llama 4 Maverick?
Gemma 3n 4B and Llama 4 Maverick are both competitive models. Gemma 3n 4B costs $0/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick. Context windows: 33K vs 1000K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Gemma 3n 4B and Llama 4 Maverick
Gemma 3n 4B is made by google while Llama 4 Maverick is from meta. Gemma 3n 4B has a 33K token context window compared to Llama 4 Maverick's 1000K. On pricing, Gemma 3n 4B costs $0/M input tokens vs $1.5/M for Llama 4 Maverick.
API pricing
Per 1M tokens
Gemma 3n 4B
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Llama 4 Maverick
Input
$1.50
Output
$2.50
Our Verdict
Llama 4 Maverick
Gemma 3n 4BRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Llama 4 Maverick has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window.
Too close to call
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
92%
Llama 4 Maverick uses 3.0x more headings
Gemma 3n 4B
Llama 4 Maverick
45%Vocabulary42%
18wSentence Length24w
0.53Hedging0.76
7.0Bold3.7
6.3Lists6.3
0.00Emoji0.00
0.25Headings0.74
0.05Transitions0.11
Based on 12 + 12 text responses
FAQ
