Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Gemma 4 26B A4BvsMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Updated Sep 2026

Gemma 4 26B A4BvsMiMo-V2.6-Flash

Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash at $0.13/M vs $0.14/M input tokens.

Gemma 4 26B A4B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash compared across 10 shared prompts
SpecGemma 4 26B A4BMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input price$0.13/M tokens$0.14/M tokens
Output price$0.4/M tokens$0.28/M tokens
Context window262K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpen—
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)No
ReleasedApr 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 5 of the 10 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Gemma 4 26B A4B894 words
Disclaimer: I am an AI, not an attorney. This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified legal professional before signing any contract.
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2.6-Flash3,600 words
Analysis of Software Consulting Agreement Overview This agreement is extraordinarily one-sided in favor of Client. Nearly every clause contains provisions that could be exploited against the Contractor. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis with specific suggested modifications.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Gemma 4 26B A4B545 words
To avoid burnout, the secret to longevity is consistency over intensity. This plan follows a "progressive loading" model: you start with small wins in Week 1 and gradually build complexity. Here is your 1-month roadmap focusing on Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep.
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2.6-Flash939 words
🌱 Your 1-Month Health & Longevity Starter Plan Philosophy: Don't overhaul everything at once. Build one small habit per week, and let them stack. 📌 The 3 Pillars Nourish — Dietary changes Move — Physical activity Restore — Sleep & stress management Week 1: Foundation (Focus: Awareness) 🥗 Nourish Audit your plate…
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Gemma 4 26B A4B363 words
Here is a recipe for a comforting, savory dish that relies on pantry staples to create a deep, rich flavor. The Golden Pantry Pasta A silky, garlic-infused pasta dish with a crispy, salty crunch.
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2.6-Flash199 words
🍯 Golden Honey-Pepper Skillet Pasta A warm, savory-sweet pasta that tastes like comfort in a bowl. 7 Pantry Ingredients: Pasta (spaghetti or penne) Olive oil (or butter) Garlic Honey Soy sauce Red pepper flakes Salt & pepper (counted as one pantry staple) ⏱️ Times Prep Time 5 minutes Cook Time 12 minutes Total ~17…
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Gemma 4 26B A4B558 words
This is a high-ambition pitch that falls into a common trap for deep-tech startups: the "Science Fiction Gap." While the vision is compelling, several claims lack the scientific and operational credibility required to justify a $15M Series A.
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2.6-Flash1,530 words
The 3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch Weakness #1: The $180B TAM (Slide 4) Why It's Weak This is the most internally contradictory claim in the entire deck.
Read the full answer

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

Gemma 4 26B A4B624 words
To the Experienced Software Engineer Focus: Complexity, Emergent Properties, and the "Training Pipeline" Think of an LLM not as a magical oracle, but as a massive, non-deterministic state machine trained via a high-throughput distributed training pipeline.
Read the full answer
MiMo-V2.6-Flash1,411 words
How LLMs Learn and Generate Text — Three Audience-Specific Explanations For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of it as an absurdly deep cache with no eviction policy.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Gemma 4 26B A4B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B
Input
$0.13
1.1× cheaper
Output
$0.40
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input
$0.14
Output
$0.28
1.4× cheaper

Gemma 4 26B A4B wins input (1.1× cheaper)·MiMo-V2.6-Flash wins output (1.4× cheaper)

Where to run it

14 hosts, cheapest first

Gemma 4 26B A4B12 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDarkbloom$0.04 in·$0.22 out·131k·99.9% upDDekaLLMbf16$0.06 in·$0.33 out·262k·99.9% upDDeepInfrafp8$0.07 in·$0.34 out·262k·99.4% upNNextBitbf16$0.09 in·$0.30 out·262k·97.3% upCCoreWeavebf16$0.10 in·$0.30 out·262k·98.5% upMMakora$0.10 in·$0.34 out·262k·99% up
6 more hostsFewer hosts
NNovitabf16$0.13 in·$0.40 out·262k·99.3% upPParasailbf16$0.13 in·$0.40 out·262k·98.8% upVVenicebf16$0.13 in·$0.40 out·256k·97.6% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.14 in·$0.40 out·262k·97.7% upGoogle Vertex AI$0.15 in·$0.60 out·262k·96% upCloudflare Workers AIdegraded$0.10 in·$0.30 out·256k·99% up
MiMo-V2.6-Flash2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Xiaomifp8$0.14 in·$0.28 out·1M·100% upDDeepInfrafp8degraded$0.14 in·$0.28 out·1M·95.3% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Gemma 4 26B A4B is developed by Google AI while MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi. Gemma 4 26B A4B has a 262K token context window vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 10 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Gemma 4 26B A4B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 10 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14/M input tokens. Gemma 4 26B A4B is $0.01/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemma 4 26B A4B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Gemma 4 26B A4B logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
MiMo-V2.6-Flash logoSolar Pro 4 logo
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoHy3 logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
MiMo-V2.6-Flash logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
MiMo-V2.6-Flash logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoGLM 5.3 logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
MiMo-V2.6-Flash logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Gemma 4 26B A4B logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Gemini 3.7 FlashSame lab
MiMo-V2.6-Flash logoMiMo-V2.6-Pro logo
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-ProSame lab
MiMo-V2.6-Flash logoMiMo-V2.5 logo
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.5Same lab
MiMo-V2.6-Flash logoSeed 2.0 Code logo
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Seed 2.0 CodeSame size
MiMo-V2.6-Flash logoSeed 2.0 Lite logo
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Seed 2.0 LiteNew provider
MiMo-V2.6-Flash logoSeed 2.1 Turbo logo
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Seed 2.1 TurboSame size
MiMo-V2.6-Flash logoSherlock Dash Alpha logo
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Sherlock Dash AlphaNew provider

Model pages

Gemma 4 26B A4B logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B58 outputs, specs and price
MiMo-V2.6-Flash logo
MiMo-V2.6-Flash10 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed