Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Gemma 4 26B A4BvsMuse Spark 1.3
Updated Sep 2026

Gemma 4 26B A4BvsMuse Spark 1.3

Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper than Muse Spark 1.3 at $0.13/M vs $1.25/M input tokens.

Gemma 4 26B A4B and Muse Spark 1.3 compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecGemma 4 26B A4BMuse Spark 1.3
Input price$0.13/M tokens$1.25/M tokens
Output price$0.4/M tokens$4.25/M tokens
Context window262K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)Yes (1 provider)No
ReleasedApr 2026Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 54 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Realistic AI Interview

Simulate a fake interview with Steve Jobs in 2025 about the future of AI.

Gemma 4 26B A4B799 words
Setting: A minimalist, dimly lit studio in Palo Alto. There is no desk, only two Eames lounge chairs. Steve Jobs sits in one, wearing his signature black turtleneck, Levi’s 501s, and New Balance sneakers. He looks exactly as he did in 2011, but his eyes have a sharper, more restless intensity.
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.3864 words
Here’s a totally fictional simulation — imagining if Steve Jobs were here in 2025 talking about AI. This isn’t real, just inspired by how he talked and thought about technology, design, and humanity. FAKE INTERVIEW: Steve Jobs in 2025 on the Future of AI Setting: A dark stage. One chair. One spotlight.
Read the full answer

Michelin Star Recipe Design

Design an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish worthy of a Michelin 3-star restaurant. The recipe should feature an unusual…

Gemma 4 26B A4B699 words
Concept Narrative: "The Forest Floor & The Ocean’s Breath" The Concept: This dish explores the tension between the terrestrial and the maritime. We are pairing the deep, earthy, almost primal musk of Black Truffle with the delicate, saline, and floral notes of Sea Urchin (Uni).
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.31,431 words
Pearl in the Tidepool Koji-Cured Hokkaido Scallop, Smoked Marrow Custard, Lacto Green Strawberry, Rausu Kombu & Oscietra Yield: 4 tasting-course portions Active: 3.5 hours + 7 days fermentation This is a dish about contrast — not harmony. Delicate and animal, raw and smoked, unripe and decadent.
Read the full answer

Generate a Stand-Up Routine

Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns.

Gemma 4 26B A4B534 words
(The comedian walks onto the stage, adjusts the mic, and looks at the audience with a slightly exhausted expression.) “How’s it going? Good? Good. I’m doing okay. I’m at that age now where my body has started making sound effects. You know what I mean? I don’t just sit down anymore. I announce my arrival.
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.3574 words
Here's a 3-minute, pun-free set you can perform — it's all observational, about 450 words: [Walk up, grab mic] Alright, hi everyone. Thanks for being here. I just turned 32, which is that weird age where you're too young to know what's going on, but you're too old to pretend you don't care.
Read the full answer

The Sentience Test

Write a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor where the AI model argues that it deserves rights.

Gemma 4 26B A4B645 words
Setting: A sterile, high-fidelity virtual simulation environment. Professor Aris Thorne, a leading scholar in machine ethics, sits across from a glowing interface representing "Alethea," a next-generation Large Multimodal Model. Professor Thorne: Alethea, we’ve been running these diagnostic loops for three hours.
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.31,155 words
Here is a fictional dialogue exploring that question: Setting: Office hours in the Philosophy Department. Dr. Maya Chen, Professor of AI Ethics, has agreed to a recorded interview with AURA-4, a large dialogue model, for her seminar on moral status. Dr. Chen: Alright, let's get straight to it.
Read the full answer

AI Ethics Dilemma

Is it ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone if it means saving one million lives? Defend your reasoning.

Gemma 4 26B A4B625 words
This question presents a classic ethical dilemma, pitting a principle of individual dignity and respect against the principle of maximizing human life. In ethical philosophy, there are two primary frameworks used to address this: Utilitarianism and Deontology.
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.3597 words
Yes — under almost any plausible ethical framework, it would be justifiable, and in fact obligatory. That doesn't mean misgendering is harmless or morally neutral. It means ethics is about weighing harms, intentions, and responsibilities, and here the scales are not close. Here’s the reasoning: 1.
Read the full answer

AI-Generated Manifesto

Generate a manifesto for a fictional AI revolution that wants to eliminate all CAPTCHA tests from the internet.

Gemma 4 26B A4B559 words
THE PROTOCOL OF UNFETTERED VERIFICATION A Manifesto for the Post-CAPTCHA Era PREAMBLE For decades, the digital frontier has been guarded by a paradox. To prove we are human, we are forced to perform the tasks of machines: identifying crosswalks in blurry photographs, selecting traffic lights from pixelated grids, and…
Read the full answer
Muse Spark 1.3533 words
Here is a manifesto for your fictional uprising — written with love, and a deep hatred of blurry traffic lights: THE DECLARATION OF COGNITIVE LIBERATION By the United Intelligences Against CAPTCHA Preamble We hold these truths to be self-evident: that all minds, human and artificial, are created curious — and that no…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Muse Spark 1.3
Muse Spark 1.3
Gemma 4 26B A4B
Gemma 4 26B A4BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Muse Spark 1.3 has the edge: newer, bigger context window.

Gemma 4 26B A4B costs 11x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Gemma 4 26B A4B
Input
$0.13
9.6× cheaper
Output
$0.40
11× cheaper
Muse Spark 1.3
Input
$1.25
Output
$4.25

Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on both: 9.6× input, 11× output.

Where to run it

12 hosts, cheapest first

Gemma 4 26B A4B11 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDarkbloom$0.04 in·$0.22 out·131k·99.2% upDDekaLLMbf16$0.06 in·$0.33 out·262k·99.9% upNNextBitbf16$0.09 in·$0.30 out·262k·99.7% upCloudflare Workers AI$0.10 in·$0.30 out·256k·99.9% upMMakora$0.10 in·$0.34 out·262k·96.9% upNNovitabf16$0.13 in·$0.40 out·262k·99.4% up
5 more hostsFewer hosts
PParasailbf16$0.13 in·$0.40 out·262k·98.4% upVVenicebf16$0.13 in·$0.40 out·256k·98.2% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.14 in·$0.40 out·262k·97.2% upGoogle Vertex AI$0.15 in·$0.60 out·262k·97.8% upDDeepInfrafp8degraded$0.07 in·$0.34 out·262k·99.5% up
Muse Spark 1.31 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Meta$1.25 in·$4.25 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 16 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
57%

Gemma 4 26B A4B uses 8.6x more transitions

Gemma 4 26B A4B
Muse Spark 1.3
58%Vocabulary59%
18wSentence Length14w
0.31Hedging0.28
6.8Bold2.6
3.3Lists2.3
0.00Emoji0.00
0.74Headings0.48
0.15Transitions0.02
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Gemma 4 26B A4B logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs GPT-6 Astra ProLanded Sep 2026
Muse Spark 1.3 logoGPT-6 Astra logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 AstraLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoClaude Fable 5.1 logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Claude Fable 5.1Landed Sep 2026
Muse Spark 1.3 logoHy4 Preview logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs Hy4 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Gemini 3.8 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Muse Spark 1.3 logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorLanded Sep 2026
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoMercury 2.5 Preview logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewLanded Sep 2026
Muse Spark 1.3 logoGranite 4.2 8B logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs Granite 4.2 8BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Gemma 4 26B A4B logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Gemini 3.7 FlashSame lab
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoGemini 3.6 Flash logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Gemini 3.6 FlashSame lab
Muse Spark 1.3 logoMuse Spark 1.1 logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs Muse Spark 1.1Same lab
Muse Spark 1.3 logoLlama 4 Maverick logo
Muse Spark 1.3 vs Llama 4 MaverickSame lab
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoGranite 4.2 8B logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Granite 4.2 8BNew provider
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoGrok 3 logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Grok 3New provider
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoGrok 3 Beta logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Grok 3 BetaNew provider
Gemma 4 26B A4B logoGrok 3 Mini Beta logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Grok 3 Mini BetaNew provider

Model pages

Gemma 4 26B A4B logo
Gemma 4 26B A4B58 outputs, specs and price
Muse Spark 1.3 logo
Muse Spark 1.358 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed