Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper than Grok 3 Mini Beta at $0.13/M vs $0.4/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemma 4 26B A4B has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.13/M tokens | $0.4/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.4/M tokens | $0.8/M tokens |
| Context window | 262K tokens | 131K tokens |
| Weights | Open | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | Yes (1 provider) | No |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Apr 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $1.30 | $4.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Gemma 4 26B A4B is developed by Google AI while Grok 3 Mini Beta is developed by xAI. Gemma 4 26B A4B has a 262K token context window vs Grok 3 Mini Beta's 131K. You can compare their actual outputs across 13 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Gemma 4 26B A4B and Grok 3 Mini Beta each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 13 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.13/M input tokens and Grok 3 Mini Beta costs $0.4/M input tokens. Gemma 4 26B A4B is $0.27/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemma 4 26B A4B and Grok 3 Mini Beta across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.